Material and Method: In this study, we analyzed the EML4-ALK mutation using the FISH and IHC techniques in 251 lung adenocarcinoma (203 primary resections, 48 metastasectomies) cases. Correlative analyses were performed between the EML4-ALK mutation, the IGFR1, TTF1, and NapsinA expression, and the clinicopathologic factors in lung adenocarcinomas.

Results: The EML4-ALK mutation was observed in 3.8% of the cases and it was associated with the solid pattern, signet ring cell morphology, and larger tumor size. IGFR1 expression was identified in 49% of the cases and most of the ALK-mutated cases were also expressing the IGFR1 protein (66%). IGFR1 expression frequency was increased in metastasectomy specimens.

Conclusion: A solid signet-ring cell pattern or mucinous cribriform pattern was present at least focally in all ALK-positive tumors, consistently with the literature. In addition, IGFR1 expression levels showed an increase in the EML4-ALK-mutated cases in our series, but the clinical significance of this finding should be supported by larger series and survival analysis. Our findings show that IGFR1 expression may be useful as a poor prognostic marker in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Many studies on lung cancer carcinogenesis have been conducted over the years. These studies are especially important for clinical treatment strategies and the development of targeted therapies. Intratumoral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status has been especially found to be a strong predictive factor in lung adenocarcinomas (AC) for the efficacy of EGFRtyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (3). Translocation and inversion of the ‘Anaplastic lymphoma kinase‘ (ALK) gene with ‘Echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4’ (EML4) has also been detected in a subset of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in 2007 (4). ALK mutations are present in approximately 3-6% of NSCLCs (5). Crizotinib is a first-generation TKI of ALK and it is the first drug with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC (6), and the patients can obtain effective results through treatment with inhibitors of ALK kinase (7). Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a nearly equivalent alternative to detect ALK mutation, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) technique still remains a reliable method for the diagnosis of ALK-rearranged fusions in NSCLC (8). Several studies have shown that certain patient characteristics such as younger age, never or light smoker, signet ring cell morphology, and adenocarcinoma subtype increase the probability of finding an ALK mutation (9,10).

Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGFR1) is a transmembrane protein implicated in promoting oncogenic transformation, growth, and survival of cancer cells (11) The overexpression of IGFR1 has been shown to correlate with postoperative recurrence and is associated with a poorer DFS in NSCLC patients (12). CT-707 is a mutant-selective inhibitor of ALK/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and IGFR1 and it is designed to be a targeted therapeutic agent for NSCLC patients harboring ALK active and crizotinib-resistant mutations (13,14). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature showing whether there is a relationship between intratumoral IGFR1 expression and ALK mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas.

In this study, we investigated the histopathological features and clinical characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinomas who harbored the EML4-ALK translocation in 251 lung resection (203 cases) and metastasectomy (48 cases) specimens. We used both the FISH and immunohistochemistry techniques for detection of ALK rearrangement. In addition, we analyzed the clinical and pathological role of IGFR1 expression and its association with the EML4-ALK mutation. Also, we examined the relationship between IGFR1, TTF-1 and Napsin-A expression, the ALK mutation, and the clinicopathological features. (15,16).

This study was supported by the ‘Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Unit’ in Turkey with the number of 01/2012-79. Ethics committee approval had been obtained on 23.05.2012 with decision number 213 at Gazi University, Turkey.

EML4-ALK Analysis by FISH (Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization) Technique
To detect EML4-ALK rearrangement, the ‘Vysis Abbott Molecular ALK Break Apart FISH probe kit’ and ‘Paraffin Pretreatment Kit IV’ were used. The evaluation was performed with the BX51 Olympus fluorescence microscopy. The cell was regarded as positive when a nucleus had at least one set of broken apart signals, or had a single red signal (deleted green signal) in addition to fused and/or broken apart signals. The distance between two separate red and green signals was estimated using two times the biggest signal size. The samples were considered positive if more than 25 out of 50 tumor cells were positive, and negative if less than 5 tumor cells were positive. The sample with 5-25 positive tumor cells was considered equivocal, and was then evaluated by a second pathologist. If the average percent of the positive cells was 15% or more, the sample was considered positive. Otherwise, it was considered negative for ALK rearrangement (Figure 1A,B).

Click Here to Zoom

Figure 1: A) EML4-ALK gene rearrangement by FISH technique (FISH; x100). B) EML4-ALK positive tumor sample with solid pattern and signed ring cell morphology (H&E; x40).

Immunohistochemistry
The IHC staining of TMA sections was performed using the Ventana automated IHC staining system (Leica, Bond- Max). All the antibody labeling was detected using the 3,3´-diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection kit. Anti IGFR1 mouse monoclonal antibody was used against human IGFR1 (ab4065; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), diluted 1:10 in PBS, and unstained slides were kept at room temperature for 45 minutes after boiling with EDTA for 20 minutes. IHC was considered positive when a distinct cell membrane staining was evident (Figure 2A-F). Nontumoral prostate tissue used for positive control. A cutoff value of 5% was used for the positivity rate and the positive cases were subclassified according to weak (1+) or strong (2+) staining rates.

Click Here to Zoom

Figure 2: A) TTF1 nuclear positive staining; 1+ positive (IHC; x40). B) TTF1 nuclear positive staining; 2+ positive (IHC; x40). C) TTF1 nuclear positive staining; 3+ positive (IHC; x40). D) Napsin A cytoplasmic granular staining (IHC; x40). E) IGFR-1 membranous staining; 1+ positive (IHC; x40). F) IGFR-1 membranous staining; 2+ positive (IHC; x20).

TTF1 (Cell Marque, mouse monoclonal, clone 8G7G3/1; Ventana), and NapsinA (Cell Marque, NapsinA rabbit polyclonal; Ventana) were investigated on an automated immunostainer. The positive controls for TTF-1 labeling were non-tumoral lung parenchyma and alveolar macrophages were used for NapsinA. TTF1 expression was subclassified according to the staining intensity as high (3+), moderate (2+), and low (1+). NapsinA staining was considered positive when tumor cells had cytoplasmic granular staining at any intensity.

IHC for ALK expression was performed wıth the D5F3 rabbit monoclonal antibody and ultrasensitive OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit with amplification (Ventana anti- ALK (D5F3) IHC Assay). Strong granular cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells was defined as positive, and no staining was considered as negative (Figure 3A,B).

Statistical Analysis: Student’s-t test was used for tumor size and age. Variables were analyzed, as appropriate, with the χ2 test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, to compare the differences in categorical variables. P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses were carried out by using the SPSS for Windows 17.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Click Here to Zoom

Table I: Characteristics of the ‘203 primary resection lung adenocarcinoma specimens’ and correlations between the patients harboring EML4-ALK mutation.

Clinical and Histological Correlations Between the Patients Harboring EML4-ALK Mutation
We identified 9 patients who harbored the EML4-ALK fusion gene (3.9% (9/229) (Figure 1A,B). Five (2.6%) of these positive cases, were lung resection specimens, and 4 (8.3%) were at metastasectomy specimens. Overall 13 cases were left out from the study as no fluorescent signal could be received. The mean tumor size of EML4-ALK positive cases was significantly larger than in EML4-ALK negative cases (mean±SD, 5.54±3.34 vs 3.61±2.02, 0.037) (Table I). Of the FISH positive cases, the male-to-female ratio was 5:4, and the mean age was 58.2 (ranging from 48 to 81 years). A predominant solid/cribriform pattern was observed in 6 (66.6%) of the 9 cases, and a predominant acinar pattern in 3 cases (33.4%) (Table II). A solid predominant pattern was also significantly found to be related with the EML-ALK mutation (0.008). More than half of the cases (5/9) showed signet ring cells (Figure 4A,B). No significant differences were found in age, gender, smoking history, pathological N-stage, tumor location, and visceral pleural invasion with the EML-ALK translocation (>0.05) (Table I).

Click Here to Zoom

Table II: Detailed clinicopathological features of EML4-ALK-positive cases (Case 1 to 5 are from the primary resection, and Case 6 to 9 are from the metastasectomy specimens).

Six of the 9 FISH-positive cases were also positive with IHC whereas 3 cases were negative with ALK IHC (Figure 3A,B). Detailed clinical, histological and immunohistochemical findings of the EML4-ALK FISH positive cases are shown in Table II.

Click Here to Zoom

Figure 3: ALK IHC and ALK FISH. A) IHC positive FISH positive (IHC; x40) (FISH; x100). B) IHC negative FISH positive (IHC; x40) (FISH; x100).

Click Here to Zoom

Figure 4: A) ALK positive tumor sample (IHC; x40) with B) signet ring cell morphology (H&E; x40).

Correlation of the IGFR1 Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters
IGFR1 expression was identified in 123 (49%) of the 251 patients. There was no significant association between IGFR1 expression and the clinical parameters (Table III).

Click Here to Zoom

Table III: Characteristics of staining with TTF-1, Napsin-A and IGFR-1 in lung adenocarcinomas.

Relationship Between IGFR1 Expression and Metastasis Risk
According to our results, the IGFR1 expression rate was significantly higher in metastasectomy specimens (45.2% vs 81.2%) (0.02). At the same time, IGFR1 staining intensity was stronger (2+) than in the primary resections (7.9% vs 35.4%) (Table IV). These results explain the effect of IGFR1 expression on the prognosis. Besides these results, IGFR1 expression was not associated with any clinicopathological characteristics in primary tumors as well as metastasectomies (Table III).

Click Here to Zoom

Table IV: IGFR1 staining rates between metastasectomy and resection cases.

Relationship Between IGFR1 Expression and EML4-ALK Mutation
Most of the ALK mutated cases were also expressing the IGFR1 protein (66%). However, this result was not statistically significant. This may be due to the small number of EML4-ALK-positive cases (>0.05).

Correlation Between TTF1 and Napsin A Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters
TTF-1 Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters
TTF1 expression was seen in 202 (80.5%) (79.3% resection, 85.4% metastasectomy) cases, and 49 (19.5%) cases were negative for TTF1. TTF1 expression had a significant correlation with the female sex and it was more frequently seen in the acinar, papillary, and lepidic patterns (81.7%) rather than solid and mucinous patterns (66.7 %) (0.036). Likewise, TTF-1 expression was more frequent in smaller tumors than the larger ones (0.042). Furthermore, there was no significant association of TTF1 expression with age, lymph node involvement, visceral pleural invasion, stage, and smoking status, in both primary cases and metastasectomies (>0.05) (Table III). We could not find a relation between expression intensity and the histological patterns, but most acinar and papillary patterns and all lepidic, micropapillary, fetal, and enteric patterns had intense (3+) expression, while others had a lower expression intensity (1+, 2+) expression with TTF1 (No data shown).

Napsin A Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters
Napsin A expression was seen in 74% (74.9% resection, 66.7% metastasectomy) of our cases. Napsin A expression was associated with the female sex (<0.001), lymph node metastasis (0.018), and the tumor size (0.013). The expression rate of Napsin A significantly decreased with tumor size (Table III). Similar to the TTF1 expression, Napsin A expression was also more frequent in welldifferentiated patterns (acinar, papillary, and lepidic) rather than solid and mucinous patterns in both primary resection (68.6%) (0.048) and metastasectomy specimens (92.3%) (0.002). Napsin A expression was not correlated with age or smoking.

Our results further indicate that the EML4-ALK translocation occurs mostly in solid predominant and signet ring cell morphology tumors (0.008), and this finding is consistent with the results of other published studies. Rodig SJ. et al. demonstrated the pattern relationship with EML4-ALK translocation in lung adenocarcinomas (25). Similarly, the EML4-ALK translocation was observed more frequently in cases with solid or acinar growth patterns, cribriform structure, mucous cells (signet-ring cells, or goblet cells), and abundant extracellular mucus, and also in those lacking lepidic growth and significant nuclear pleomorphism in a different study (26).

We could not find any statistically significant correlation between TTF1, NapsinA, or IGFR1 expression and the EML4-ALK translocation.

The present study revealed a significant finding regarding IGFR1 expression. IGFR1 expression was correlated with increased metastasis risk. These results indicate that IGFR1 expression can be used to indicate a poor prognosis. Nakagawa et al. have shown that high IGFR1 expression is associated with increased postoperative recurrence and poorer disease-free survival (12). Many studies share the correlation of IGFR1 expression with cell survival, growth, proliferation and angiogenesis, as well as blocking of apoptosis, and it is also linked with many cancers in different organs (27,28). In a recent study blocking ALK and IGFR1 receptors together with the CT-707 drug, which is one of the FAK (focal adhesion kinase) inhibitors, significantly inhibited tumor growth without obvious side effects (13,29). Overexpression of IGF1R and FAK are closely associated with metastatic breast tumors (30). Our results indicate increased levels of IGFR1 expression in metastasectomy specimens. However, we could not find a relationship with the other prognostic parameters, maybe due to the low number of cases in our study.

Few studies have implicated a correlation between TTF1 positivity by IHC and EGFR, KRAS mutation status (31). However, the role of TTF1 in lung cancer pathogenesis and its relationship with the ALK translocation status is unclear. TTF1 and NapsinA are mainly used as diagnostic markers of lung adenocarcinomas in daily practice. In our cohort, 80% of the cases were positive with TTF1 and/or NapsinA. In addition, 33 cases (13%) were negative with both TTF1 and NapsinA. These cases were diagnosed as pulmonary adenocarcinoma based on the morphological features and the clinical ruling out of other possible primaries with IHC. Our results showed that TTF1 and NapsinA expression were associated with the female sex and smaller tumor sizes. Napsin A expression was also related to a good prognosis because of its relationship with the N0 cases. These results are consistent with the literature. (32).

In our study, we investigated the correlation of TTF1 and NapsinA expression by IHC with EML4-ALK mutations and also with the clinicopathological characteristics. According to our results, all EML4-ALK mutated cases were positive with TTF1 and NapsinA (100%). This result is consistent with the other similar study in the literature (33). Inamura et al. explained the TTF1 positivity of EML4- ALK lung cancers with the ‘terminal respirator unit (TRU) histogenesis. TRU-type lung cancers with a TTF1 positive cell lineage often occur in non or light smokers, which frequently harbor EGFR mutations (61%) and have lessfrequent TP53 mutations (36%) compared to non-TRUtypes (57%) (33,34).

CONFLICT of INTEREST
The authors declare no confict of interest.

FUNDING
This study was funded by the ‘Gazi University Scientific research projects unit’ in Turkey with the number of 01/2012-79.

AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS
Concept: NA, LM, Design: NA, Data collection or processing: PB, NA, Analysis or Interpretation: PB, NA, Literature search: PB, Writing: PB, Approval: PB.

1) Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7-34.

2) Didkowska J, Wojciechowska U, Mańczuk M, Lobaszewski J. Lung cancer epidemiology: Contemporary and future challenges worldwide. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:150.

3) Isaka T, Nakayama H, Ito H, Yokose T, Yamada K, Masuda M. Impact of the epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status on the prognosis of recurrent adenocarcinoma of the lung after curative surgery. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:959.

4) Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Takada S, Yamashita Y, Ishikawa S, Fujiwara SI, Watanabe H, Kurashina K, Hatanaka H, Bando M, Ohno S, Ishikawa Y, Aburatani H, Niki T, Sohara Y, Sugiyama Y, Mano H. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448:561-6.

5) Solomon B, Varella-Garcia M, Camidge DR. ALK gene rearrangements: A new therapeutic target in a molecularly defined subset of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1450-4.

6) Patel SP, Pakkala S, Pennell NA, Reckamp KL, Lanzalone S, Polli A, Jamal T, Robert Vizcarrondo F. Phase Ib Study of Crizotinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Translocation. Oncologist. 2020;25:562-e1012.

7) Fan J, Fong T, Xia Z, Zhang J, Luo P. The efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2018;7:4993- 5005.

8) Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch F, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski D, Ladanyi M, Nowak J, Sholl L, Temple S, Solomon B, Souter L, Thunnissen E, Tsao M, Ventura C, Wynes M, Yatabe Y. Updated molecular testing guideline for the selection of lung cancer patients for treatment with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Guideline from the college of American pathologists, the international association for the study of lung cancer, and the association for molecular pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:321-46.

9) Tian P, Liu Y, Zeng H, Tang Y, Lizaso A, Ye J Shao, Lin, Li Y. Unique molecular features and clinical outcomes in young patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring ALK fusion genes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146:935-44.

10) Zhao F, Xu M, Lei H, Zhou Z, Wang L, Li P ZJ, Hu P. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with non-smallcell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK fusion gene: A metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117333.

11) Khandwala HM, Mccutcheon IE, Flyvbjerg A, Friend KE. The effects of insulin-like growth factors on tumorigenesis and neoplastic growth. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:215-44.

12) Nakagawa M, Uramoto H, Shimokawa H, Onitsuka T, Hanagiri T, Tanaka F. Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 expression predicts postoperative recurrence in adenocarcinoma of the lung. Exp Ther Med. 2011;2:585-90.

13) Liang C, Zhang N, Tan Q, Liu S, Luo R, Wang Y Shi, Yuankai Han X. CT-707 overcomes resistance of crizotinib through activating PDPK1- AKT1 pathway by targeting FAK. Current Cancer Drug Targets. 2018;19:655-65.

14) Cui C, Hu P, Jiang J, Kong F, Luo H, Zhao Q. An UPLC-MS/MS method to determine CT-707 and its two metabolites in plasma of ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;153:1-8.

15) Kadota K, Nitadori JI, Sarkaria IS, Sima CS, Jia X, Yoshizawa A, Rusch VW, Travis WD, Adusumilli PS. Thyroid transcription factor-1 expression is an independent predictor of recurrence and correlates with the IASLC/ATS/ERS histologic classification in patients with stage i lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119:931-8.

16) Dziadziuszko R, Merrick DT, Witta SE, Mendoza AD, Szostakiewicz B, Szymanowska ARW, Dziadziuszko K, Jassem J, Bunn PA, Varella GM, Hirsch FR. Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) gene copy number is associated with survival in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: A comparison between IGF1R fluorescent in situ hybridization, protein expression, and mRNA expression. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2174-80.

17) Travis WD, Brambilla E, Van Schil P, Scagliotti G V., Huber RM, Sculier JP Vansteenkiste J, Nicholson AG. Paradigm shifts in lung cancer as defined in the new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:239-43.

18) Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, Chirieac LR, Dacic S, Duhig E, Flieder DB, Geisinger K, Hirsch FR, Ishikawa Y, Kerr KM, Noguchi M, Pelosi G, Powell CA, Tsao MS, Ignacio W. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:1243-60.

19) Hochmair M, Weinlinger C, Schwab S, Naber J, Setinek U, Krenbek D Urban, Matthias H, Fabikan H, Watzka S, Koger R, Fazekas A, Bitterlich E, Valipour A, Burghuber OC. Treatment of ALK -rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer with brigatinib as second or later lines: Real-world observations from a single institution. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2019;30:740-4.

20) Liu Y, Wu S, Shi X, Liang Z, Zeng X. ALK detection in lung cancer: Identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146:1307-20.

21) Zhao R, Zhang J, Han Y, Shao J, Zhu L, Xiang C, Zhang Q, Teng H, Qin G, Zhao L, Ye M, Zhao J, Ding W, Ye M, Zhao J, Ding W. Clinicopathological features of ALK expression in 9889 cases of non-small-cell lung cancer and genomic rearrangements identified by capture-based next-generation sequencing: A Chinese retrospective analysis. Mol Diagn Ther. 2019;23:395-405.

22) Kometani T, Sugio K, Osoegawa A, Seto T, Ichinose Y. Clinicopathological features of younger (aged ≤ 50 years) lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring the EML4-ALK fusion gene. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9:563-70.

23) Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, Digumarthy SR, Costa DB, Heist RS, Solomon B, Stubbs H, Admane S, McDermott U, Settleman J, Kobayashi S, Mark EJ, Rodig SJ, Chirieac LR, Kwak EL, Lynch TJ, Iafrate AJ. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4247-53.

24) Shi J, Gu W, Zhao Y, Zhu J, Jiang G, Bao M, Shi J. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EML4- ALK rearrangement in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching study. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:589-98.

25) Rodig SJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Dacic S, Yeap BY, Shaw A, Barletta JA, Stubbs H, Law K, Lindeman N, Mark E, Janne PA, Lynch T, Johnson BE, Iafrate AJ, Chirieac LR. Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5216-23.

26) Yoshida A, Tsuta K, Nakamura H, Kohno T, Takahashi F, Asamura H Sekine, Ikuo, Fukayama M, Shibata T, Furuta K, Tsuda H. Comprehensive histologic analysis of ALK-rearranged lung carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1226-34.

27) Adachi Y, Li R, Yamamoto H, Min Y, Piao W, Wang Y, Imsumran A, Li H, Arimura Y, Lee, CT, Imai K, Carbone DP, Shinomura Y. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor blockade reduces the invasiveness of gastrointestinal cancers via blocking production of matrilysin. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1305-13.

28) Lewis DA, Travers JB, Somani AK, Spandau DF. The IGF-1/IGF- 1R signaling axis in the skin: A new role for the dermis in agingassociated skin cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:1475-85.

29) Wang DD, Chen Y, Chen ZB, Yan FJ, Dai XY, Ying MD, Cao J, Ma J, Luo P, Han Y, Peng Y, Sun Y, Zhang H, He Q, Yang B, Zhu H. CT-707, a novel FAK inhibitor, synergizes with cabozantinib to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma by blocking cabozantinibinduced FAK activation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15:2916-25.

30) Taliaferro-Smith LT, Oberlick E, Liu T, McGlothen T, Alcaide T, Tobin R, Donnelly S, Commander R, Kline E, Nagaraju G, Havel L, Marcus A, Nahta R, O’Regan R. FAK activation is required for IGF1R-mediated regulation of EMT, migration, and invasion in mesenchymal triple negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4757-72.

31) Liu B, Shi SS, Wang X, Xu Y, Zhng XH, Yu H, Lu Z, Wang D, Zhou J. Relevance of molecular alterations in histopathologic subtyping of lung adenocarcinoma based on 2011 international multidisciplinary lung adenocarcinoma classification. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2012;41:505-10.

32) Zhang P, Han YP, Huang L, Li Q, Ma DL. Value of napsin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 in the identification of primary lung adenocarcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2010;1:899-903.

33) Inamura K, Takeuchi K, Togashi Y, Hatano S, Ninomiya H, Motoi N, Mun M, Sakao Y, Okumura S, Nakagawa K, Soda M, Lim Y, Mano H, Ishikawa Y. EML4-ALK lung cancers are characterized by rare other mutations, a TTF-1 cell lineage, an acinar histology, and young onset. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:508-15.

34) Yatabe Y, Kosaka T, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. EGFR mutation is specific for terminal respiratory unit type adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:633-9.