Here we report a case of intraosseous schwannoma in the radius of a 19 year-old female which was misdiagnosed as a sarcoma.
Even it is a very rare lesion of bone one should be aware of the fact that when a small biopsy is taken, it can be misdiagnosed as sarcoma or fibrous dysplasia.
In this article, we report a case of intraosseous schwannoma of the radius.
Figure 1: Pathological fracture caused by intramedullary located mass, X-ray.
Myofibroblastic and osteoblastic activity with focal spindle cell proliferation were seen at the tru-cut biopsy and the pathologic diagnosis was interpreted as ‘healing pathologic fracture ‘and the clinicians were informed that the focal spindle cell proliferation was not enough to diagnose a fibrous dysplasia and resection was planned. After 3 months, at the peroperative examination the cortex was intact and the fracture was seen totally healed and curettage was done instead of resection by the accompaniment of frozen-section. The material was 2cc haemorragic elastic tissue with small bone particles in it. The final diagnosis was left to the paraffin sections at the time, and the operation was ended after cortical and medullar material was taken from the lesion site.
Microscopic examination of the hematoxylene-eosinstained sections of the curettage specimen revealed foci of Antoni type-A areas including spindle cells arranged with palisading, ovoid, basophilic nuclei and acidophilic cytoplasm, and Antoni type-B areas. Acellular, eosinophilic areas described as Verocay bodies were also noted. As it was a curettage material, the borders and the capsule of the lesion could not be examined (Figure 3 and 4). Immunohistochemical examination revealed positive results for S100 and PGP 9.5 protein (Figure 5 and 6). The histological diagnosis was primary intraosseous schwannoma of the radius. No recurrence was observed in the follow-up study at 45 months.
Figure 3: Intramedullary tumor (H&E, x100).
Figure 4: Histopathological appearence of a typical schwannoma, Antoni-A areas (H&E, x200).
Figure 5: Immunohistochemical technique, PGP 9,5 primary antibody (DAB, x400).
Figure 6: Immunohistochemical technique, S100 primary antibody (DAB, x400).
Schwannoma can involve bone by three mechanisms: 1) secondary erosion by an extraosseous tumor, 2) tumor arising from a nerve coursing through a canal in a bone and causing erosion of the bone, creating a dumbbell-shaped configuration or 3) tumor arising centrally (intramedullary) in a bone. The first two mechanisms occur most frequently[13]. As there was no extraosseous mass, we thought the 2nd or the 3rd mechanism was the possible reason in our case. But no clue was found about the adjacent nerve bundles in the curettage specimen. We can assume that the 3rd mechanism is the the most probable mechanism way in our case, as there is no recurrence since the operation.
The radiological appearance is a well-circumscribed, occasionally multilocular osteolysis with inconstant peripheral osteosclerosis, thinning without rupture of the cortex and no soft-tissue invasion, no periosteal reaction, and no intratumoral calcification[14]. But, as happened in our case, if there is a healing pathologic fracture, the radiological images could be misdiagnosed as bone sarcoma.
Macroscopically it is a soft, tan-gray lesion with frequent yellowish patchy areas. Haemorrhage, myxoid, and cystic changes are frequently present. When the lesion is present in a neural canal or foramina, a capsule may be discernible. There is no invasion of surrounding medullary bone[2,13].
Microscopic features are similar to those of their more common counterparts. The tumors have two basic patterns: hypercellular (Antoni A) and hypocellular (Antoni B) areas. In Antoni A areas of schwannoma cells that are compactly arranged form focally palisading structures (Verocay bodies). In Antoni B areas, schwannoma cells are widely separated by a loose intervening collagenous matrix. Vessels with thick hyalinized walls are present focally. Variable numbers of histiocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, and mast cells may be present. Some variants are hypercellular and may have less distinguishible Antoni A and B areas. These lesions may exhibit some nuclear atypia, and occasional mitoses may be present. These tumors are compatible with so-called cellular schwannomas and should be carefully differentiated from malignant neoplasms. There is no evidence of malignant potential for this tumor in the English literature. Ultrastructural features of intraosseous schwannomas are the same as those described for soft tissue schwannomas. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for vimentin and S-100 protein[13].
It is easy to make the differential diagnosis from a sarcoma, if the biopsy is taken only from the tumor. Although degenerative atypia which is a common feature of neural tumors and may cause problems in differentiating these tumors from spindle cell sarcomas, it is important to remember that atypical mitoses are never seen in benign Schwannoma while it is a common feature of sarcomas[13]. Differential diagnosis of schwannoma in small biopsy taken from the pathologic fracture zone is a complicated situation as we experienced in our case. The biopsy sample complicated with fracture healing process may produce a diagnostic dilemma. Especially if the sample is containing the nonrepresentative area of a heterogeneous lesion, misinterpretation of the biopsy is inevitable. Likewise fibroblastic and myofibroblastic activity without bone of a healing or healed pathologic fracture zone can be misdiagnosed as any spindle cell tumor including schwannoma. On the other hand since intraosseous schwannomas are rare tumors and because of lytic rarefactions and sometimes bubbly appearance with irregular borders, they may be misinterpreted as fibrous dysplasias radiologically[2]. When the small biopsy specimen is examined as in our case with this radiologic prediagnosis, fusiform-shaped cells of schwannoma may cause diagnostic overlapping with fibrous component of fibrous dysplasia, especially when the material is lacking typical wowen bone of fibrooseeous lesion. Although they are rare in occurrence when a spindle cell lesion is evaluated from a tru-cut biopsy material intraosseous schwannomas must be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis along with other spindle cell lesions such as desmoplastic fibroma, nonossifying fibroma and fibrous dyplasia[13]. Cytological examination helps to reveal the Schwannian (wavy), fibroblastic (spindle) or myofibroblastic (plumpy) features of the nucleus. In addition to cytological features immunohistochemistry panel containing SMA, S-100 protein and Ki-67 can be used as an ancillary diagnostic tool. Clinicopathological multidisciplinary approach and evaluation of complicated cases along with radiological findings may also help in solving the diagnostic problems in rare bone tumor cases such as intraosseous schwannoma.
1) Fawcett KJ, Dahlin DC: Neurilemmoma of bone. Am J Clin
Pathol 1967, 47:759-766 [ Özet ]
2) Unni KK: Dahlin's bone tumors. General aspects and data on
11,087 cases, 5th edn, Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996, 343-
347
3) Meyer A, Sailhan F, Coulomb A, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Mary
P, Ducou-Lepointe H, Damsin JP: Proximal tibial epiphyseal
intraosseous schwannoma, a rare entity. J Pediatr Orthop 2008,
28:786-790 [ Özet ]
4) Nakasato T, Katoh K, Ehara S, Tamakawa Y, Hoshino M,
Izumizawa M, Sakamaki K, Fukuta Y, Kudoh K: Intraosseous
neurilemmoma of the mandible. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000,
21:1945-1947 [ Özet ]
5) Chi AC, Carey J, Muller S: Intraosseous schwannoma of the
mandible: A case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg
Oral Med Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 96:54-65 [ Özet ]
6) Chevalier X, Montazel JL, Voisin MC, Hernigio P: Intraosseous
neurilemmoma of the lower third of the fibula. AJR 1995, Letters:
165, 1555-1556 [ Özet ]
7) Erşahin Y, Mutluer S, Demirtaş E: Intraosseous neurinoma of
the parietal bone. Child's Nerv Sys, 2000, 16:181-183
8) Goyal R, Saikia UN, Vashishta RK, Gulati G, Sharma RK:
Intraosseous schwannoma of the frontal bone. Orthopedics,
2008, 31:281 [ Özet ]
9) Mutema GK, Sorger J: Intraosseous schwannoma of the humerus.
Skeletal Radiol, 2002, 31:419-421 [ Özet ]
10) Nannapaneni R, Sinar EJ: Intraosseous schwannoma of the
cervical spine. Br J Neurosurg 2005, 19:244-247 [ Özet ]
11) Turk PS, Peters N, Libbey PN, Wanebo HJ: Diagnosis and
management of giant intrasacral schwannoma. Cancer 1992, 70:
2650-2657
12) Giné J, Calmet J, Sirvent JJ, Domènech S: Intraosseous
neurilemmoma of the radius: a case report. J Hand Surg Am
2000, 25:365-369 [ Özet ]
13) Dorfman HD, Czerniak B: Bone tumors, St. Louis, Mosby, 1998,
825-831
14) Agha FP, Lilienfeld RM: Roentgen features of osseous
neurilemmoma. Radiology 1972, 102:325-326 [ Özet ]