The kidney measured 9x7x5 cm. On cut section, the cortex and medulla could not be seen, and the kidney was replaced by a grey-white homogenous lesion having a whorled myomatous appearance. A thin segment of compressed normal kidney was seen. A small cyst measuring 1 cm in diameter was also noted (Figure 1).
Microscopy revealed a monomorphous lesion composed of interlacing fascicles of spindled cells. These cells were plump with moderate amount of cytoplasm and elongated vesicular nuclei. Dilated thin walled vascular spaces were also noted. The tumor margins were irregular, with radiating bands extending into the normal renal parenchyma (Figure 2). Entrapped renal glomeruli and tubules were also seen in the tumor (Figure 3). The medial margins of the kidney were free of tumor. Multiple sections did not show any blastemous component. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for vimentin, actin and desmin were positive. Based on the microscopic appearance and IHC, a diagnosis of CMN was made.
CMN is diagnosed in the first few months of life. It may even present in utero, causing non-immune hydrops and polyhydramnios[2].
Mesoblastic nephromas grossly appear as solitary, unilateral masses with firm, bulging cut surfaces often indistinguishable from nephroblastomas that have been treated with chemotherapy. Cysts, haemorrhage and necrosis are common. However, some lesions are quite firm. Most CMNs are centered around the hilus of the kidney and mostly involve the renal sinus, and careful surgical and pathological examination of the medial aspect of the nephrectomy and its medial margin is therefore of paramount importance.
Histologically, they are composed of spindled mesenchymal cells of fibroblastic or myofibroblastic lineage and are thought to arise from secondary mesenchyme. Two histological subtypes have been described: classic and cellular type[1]. The classic type resembles infantile fibromatosis with interlacing fascicles of spindle cells, resembling fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, interspersed with scant collagen fibres. Tumor margins are highly irregular with radiating tongues of cells extending into the parenchyma and perirenal soft tissues[2]. Abnormal metaplastic changes in the tubules or glomeruli adjacent to or entrapped by the lesion are present. Only 24% of CMNs are of the classic type. The cellular type, which is more common, is characterized by increased cellular density and high proliferative rate, imparting a sarcomatous appearance to the tumor. Mitotic activity is more conspicuous than the classic type[1]. Cellular and classic patterns coexist and they are described as mixed mesoblastic nephroma. Extramedullary hematopoiesis can be observed. Skeletal muscle differentiation is not a feature of CMN. Our case showed the classic pattern. CMNs are positive for vimentin, actin and desmin. The onion skin rings of muscle (collarettes) around tubules and blood vessels, juxtaglomerular hyperplasia, angiodysplasia and desmin negativity, which are characteristic features of MST, were absent in our case distinguishing it from MST[3]. The characteristic branching vasculature and diversity of patterns which are specific to CSSK help to distinguish it from CMN. Our case could be distinguished from Wilms tumor that had been treated with chemotherapy by the absence of blastematous foci on histology. Wilms tumor is also seen after six months of age.
All CMNs behave clinically in a benign fashion and it is therefore important to differentiate them from aggressive mimics as nephrectomy is curative[4]. There is a case reported to undergo spontaneous regression[5].
This communication highlights a case of CMN, an underreported pediatric renal neoplasm with a good prognosis after total excision.
1) Agrani P,Beckwith JB: Renal neoplasma of childhood. In Mills SE. (Ed): Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. 4th ed., Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004, 2016-2019
2) Wu E. Pathologic quiz case: A renal tumor in a newborn child. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:103-104 [ Özet ]
3) Rajalakshmi V, Chandran P, Selvambigai, Ganesh J. Metanephric stromal tumor: A novel pediatric renal neoplasm. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2009;52:389-391 [ Özet ]
4) Khashu M,Osiovich H,Sargent MA. Congenital mesoblastic nephroma presenting with neonatal hypertension. J Perinatol 2005;25:433-435 [ Özet ]
5) Whittle S, Gosain A, Brown PY, Debelenko L, Raimondi S, Wilimas JA, Jenkins JJ, Davidoff AM. Regression of a congenital mesoblastic nephroma. Pediatric Blood Cancer 2010;55:364-368 [ Özet ]