Dehner[4] described three different types of PPB morphologically according to gross and microscopic features. The prognosis is strongly correlated with the histological type. Five-year survival rate was 80-90% in patients with type 1, while 50% in type 2 and 3. In this report we present a case of type 3 PPB in order to discuss the clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical features and the differential diagnosis of the disease.
Core needle biopsy of the lesion demonstrated histologically small tissue fragments consisting of primitive round embryonal cells in a loose myxoid stroma (Figure 2). Although these cells were predominantly monotonous, some showed eosinophilic cytoplasm and larger nucleus (Figure 3). These morphological findings were suspicious for PPB.
Figure 2: Primitive round embryonal cells in a loose myxoid stroma (H&E; X100).
Figure 3: Rhabdomyomatous transformation of the tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm (H&E; X200).
A surgical biopsy was also performed later by thoracotomy. On histopathological evaluation, predominantly solid partially necrotic tumor tissue was observed. The tumor tissue also contained a few cystic areas. The tumor cells present in the myxoid stroma were round or fusiform in shape and their nuclei were hyperchromatic. These blastomatous looking tumor cells were organised in some areas resembling the cambium layer of the rhabdomyosarcomas. Immunohistochemically the tumor cells were stained diffusely positive with vimentin, weakly positive for desmin and negative Mic-2 (CD99) and actin. MIB-1 index was over 90%.
After debulking of the tumor by four cycles VAC (Vincristine, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy, a right upper lobectomy was performed. Macroscopically the lobectomy specimen showed the tumoral lesion of 7x9 cm with solid tan-coloured cut surface (Figure 4). Histopathological diagnosis was type 3 PPB characterized by solid areas consisting of rhabdomyosarcomatous cells. These cells appeared primitive and atypical but some showed large eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical staining revealed positive immunoreactivity with desmin and vimentin (Figure 5). The final pathological diagnosis was PPB type 3. A diaphragmatic tissue sampled surgically also revealed a tumoral infiltration that was similar histopathologically.
Figure 4: The cut surface of the macroscopical specimen. Note the tumor consisting of solid areas.
Figure 5: Strong positivity by immunhistochemistry in rhabdomyosarcomatous areas. (desmin, X100).
The hilar lymph nodes were negative. ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) treatment protocol was started and the overall prognosis in the 9 months follow-up is very good without any evidence of recurrence.
Dehner[4] defined three types of PPB morphologically. Type 1 was characterized as multilocular cysts surrounded by ciliated columnar respiratory type benign metaplastic epithelium separated by fibrous septa[6]. Beneath the respiratory epithelium a continuous or interrupted cell layer including immature or primitive tumor cells morphologically varying from small round to fusiform-shaped cells resembles the cambium layer of botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma[6].
Histopathologically, solid areas of type 2 and type 3 tumors show the characteristics of both blastomatosis and sarcomatosis. In type 2 lesions cysts are observed macroscopically, however there are some solid areas including anaplastic cell clusters, cartilage, and nodules of blastoma. Type 3 lesions seem like type 2 lesions; however they include predominantly solid areas. Features like nodules of cartilage with malign appearance, cellular aggregates of anaplastic and pleomorphic cells, areas like fibrosarcoma, foci of rhabdomyosarcomatosis, liposarcomatosis, or chondrosarcomatosis and areas that seem like condensed blastoma separated with loose fusiform cells can be seen alone or combined[6].
Most of the neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for vimentin. It is positive in focal areas of rhabdomyoblastic cell population, cartilage, fibrosarcoma, or histiocytoma and foci of blastomatosis. Only respiratory epithelial cells are cytokeratin (CK) positive, smooth muscle actin and desmin are positive mainly in rhabdomyoblastic cells; on the other hand they can be positive focally in primitive cells[6,9]. S100 expression in nodules of cartilage may be helpful to distinguish cystic lesions of lung and chest wall from synovial sarcomas. Moreover, negative CD99, EMA (epithelial membrane antigen) and CK are also useful in the differential diagnosis from synovial sarcoma[9].
In differential diagnosis there are other tumors that contain mainly small round cells[10]. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors that appear in the thoracic soft tissue show more cellular areas including rosette formation. The differential diagnosis of PPB also includes rhabdomyosarcoma, mestastatic neuroblastoma, extrarenal rhabdoid tumor, desmoplastic small cell tumor, congenital infantile fibrosarcoma, metastatic myxoid chondrosarcoma and other biphasic childhood tumors that may affect the chest[8]. Rhabdomyosarcomas are treated with a different protocol, therefore the differential diagnosis is important. In PPBs of the mediastinum lymphoblastic lymphomas should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Pulmonary blastoma, which is important in differential diagnosis, is a rare congenital lung tumor, but it is usually seen in adults. Malignant epithelial cells are not seen in PPB and this morphology is an important key point to distinguish it from pulmonary blastoma[8].
Although present symptoms are similar, the clinical prognosis depends the histological type and five-year survival appears better in type 1 patients, while it is worse in type 3. In type 1, besides a better prognosis, recurrences can occur locally. Central nerve system is the major area for metastasis. Spinal cord and skeletal system also carry risk of metastasis. Ocular and pancreatic metastases have also been reported[2]. The management of PPBs is a multimodal approach including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells, however an effective treatment has not been defined yet[11-13]. Indolfi P et al. reported[14] that extrapulmonary invasion is the parameter of worse prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 9-10 weeks should be followed by a successful total resection.
In conclusion PPB is a very rare childhood cancer that needs to be considered in the pathological differential diagnosis of thoracic tumors in the children. This case is reported also because of its diagnosis performed by needle biopsy.
1) Manivel JC, Priest JR, Watterson J, Steiner M, Woods WG, Wick
MR, Dehner LP. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: The so called
pulmonary blastoma of childhood. Cancer. 1988;62:1516–26. [ Özet ]
2) Kelsey AM, McNally K, Birch J, Mitchell EL. Case of extra
pulmonary, pleuro-pulmonary blastoma in a child: Pathological
and cytogenetic findings. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997;29:61-4. [ Özet ]
3) Piastra M, Ruggiero A, Caresta E, Granone P, Chiaretti A,
Polidori G, Riccardi R. Critical presentation of pleuropulmonary
blastoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21:223-6. [ Özet ]
4) Dehner LP. Pleuro-pulmonary blastoma in the pulmonary
blastoma of childhood. Sem Diag Pathol. 1994;11:144–51. [ Özet ]
5) Priest JR, Watterson J, Strong L, Huff V, Woods WG, Byrd RL,
Friend SH, Newsham I, Amylon MD, Pappo A, Mahoney DH,
Langston C, Heyn R, Kohut G, Freyer DR, Bostrom B, Richardson
MS, Barredo J, Dehner LP. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: A marker
for familial disease. J Pediatr. 1996;128:220-4. [ Özet ]
6) Priest JR, McDermott MB, Watterson SJ, Manivel JC, Dehner LP.
Pleuropulmonary blastoma a clinicopathologic study of 50 cases.
Cancer. 1997;80:147–61. [ Özet ]
7) Yusuf U, Dufour D, Jenrette JM 3rd, Abboud MR, Laver J, Barredo
JC. Survival with combined modality therapy after intracerebral
recurrence of pleuropulmonary blastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol.
1998;30:63–6. [ Özet ]
8) Nicol KK, Geisinger KR. The cytomorphology of pleuropulmonary
blastoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:416-18. [ Özet ]
9) Gupta K, Vankalakunti M, Das A, Marwaha RK. An autopsy
report of a rare pediatric lung tumor: Pleuropulmonary blastoma.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51:225-7. [ Özet ]
10) Geisinger K, Silverman J, Wakely P Jr. Pediatr Cytopathology.
Chicago, III: American Society of Clinical Pathologists Press;
1994. 201–353.
11) Indolfi P, Casale F, Carli M, Bisogno G, Ninfo V, Cecchetto G,
Bagnulo S, Santoro N, Giuliano M, Di Tullio MT. Pleuropulmonary
blastoma: Management and prognosis of 11 cases. Cancer. 2000;
89:1396–401. [ Özet ]
12) de Castro CG Jr, de Almeida SG, Gregianin LJ, Loss JF, Rivero
LF, Schwartsmann G, Brunetto AL. High dose chemotherapy
and autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue in a patient
with pleuropulmonary blastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;
25:78–81. [ Özet ]
13) Kotiloğlu E, Kaya H, Kiyan G, Tüney D, Canpolat C. A rare
primary pulmonary tumor of childhood. Turk J Pediatr. 2002;
44:156-9. [ Özet ]
14) Indolfi P, Bisogno G, Casale F, Cecchetto G, De Salvo G, Ferrari
A, Donfrancesco A, Donofrio V, Martone A, Di Martino M, Di
Tullio MT. Prognostic factors in pleuro-pulmonary blastoma.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:318–23. [ Özet ]