Figure 1A,B: Clinical photograph of the palpable masses on the right thigh.
The patient's complete blood count and other routine biochemical values were within normal limits. Ultrasonographically, there were hypoechoic spherical-ovoid solid masses with regular margins including punctate echogenicity (Figure 2A). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the subcutaneous fatty tissue showed hypointense solid masses that were localized from the inguinal canal extending to the anteromedial thigh, on T1-T2-weighted images (Figure 2B).
We performed an excisional biopsy of one of the masses for histopathological diagnosis. Macroscopically, the lesion was a 3x3x2 cm, gray-white, regularly contoured, unencapsulated solid mass. The cut surface was gritty in texture. Histopathologically, the tumor consisted of well circumscribed, unencapsulated, paucicellular, hyalinized fibrosclerotic tissue. There was neither cellular atypia nor mitotic figure in the fibroblasts. Lymphoid aggregates consisting of lymphocytes and plasma cells were also present. Psammomatous and dystrophic calcifications were scattered throughout the lesion. (Figure 2C, D). Immunohistochemically, spindle cells showed diffuse positivity for vimentin (Figure 3) and negativity for CD34, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), S-100, cytokeratin, actin, desmin and CD117. The lesion was diagnosed as calcifying fibrous tumor.
Figure 3: Vimentin expression in spindle cells (Vimentin x200).
The patient was informed about his pathology and advised to undergo total surgical excision. Unfortunately, he left and never returned to complete the procedure and was therefore lost to clinical follow up.
Macroscopically, CFT is well circumscribed and unencapsulated. Its diameter ranges from 1 to 15 cm. In some cases the tumor may have indistinct boundaries; hence infiltration may be indistinguishable from the surrounding tissues. On sectioning, the tumor reveals a solid, grey-whitish and gritty texture.
Histopathologically, it is characterized by abundant hyalinized collagen tissue with lymphoplasmacytic mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrate and dystrophic - psammomatous calcifications. Lymphoid aggregates can be found in some cases. Although immunohistochemical analysis is not necessary for diagnosis[4], fibroblasts do express vimentin and factor XIIIa and CD34 immunoexpression can be seen on rare occasions[10,11]. Ultrastructural studies show that calcifications occur as a result of cytoplasmic degeneration in the fibroblasts[6,9].
The histopathological features of CFTs are generally easily recognizable from other reactive or benign neoplastic lesions. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor (RNFP), nodular fasciitis, desmoid fibromatosis, fibroma of tendon sheath and calcifying aponeurotic fibroma might be considered in the differential diagnosis[12]. IMT is composed of spindled myofibroblasts, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells. It is more cellular and shows less hyalinization than CFT. In addition, a polymorphic inflammatory cell infiltration and occasional stromal calcification can be seen in IMT. Actin and ALK immunoexpression is positive in IMT[9,14]. In fact, some authors consider CFT to be a late sclerosing stage of IMT[4]. In reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor (RNFP), actin, desmin and CD117 immunoexpression is positive and CD34 is negative in addition to the characteristic histopathological features of CFT. Desmoid fibromatosis is poorly circumscribed with infiltration of the surrounding structures and more cellular than CFT. Nodular fasciitis is composed of plump myofibroblastic cells in a myxoid stroma without calcification. Fibromas of the tendon sheath generally occur in distal extremities such as the thumb and the fingers. It is composed of paucicellular spindled fibroblasts in a collagenous stroma and slit-like vascular channels. Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma is usually seen on the palms and soles of children. Its boundaries are more irregular than CFT. Band-like calcification, chondroid metaplasia and multinuclear giant cells can also be seen[3,12].
There are few studies regarding cytogenetic abnormalities in calcifying fibrous tumors. By using fluorescent in situ hybridization, Hoffmann et al attempted to detect trisomy 7 and trisomy 8 which has been reported in other benign fibrous tumors. Due to the low signal intensity, they were not able to complete the study.[13]. In another study, Fukunaga et al found that CFT had a diploid DNA content by flow cytometry[14]. Whether CFT is a true neoplasm or a reactive process still remains unknown[13-15]. Future molecular studies can be helpful for detecting the biologic behavior of CFT.
As a result, CFT is a rare benign lesion and conservative excision is sufficient to cure the patient. However, local recurrence can be seen in some cases. Thus clinical followup is important.
THANKS
The authors thank Armağan Günal for immunohistochemical
evaluation.
1) R osenthal NS, Abdul-Karim FW. Childhood fibrous tumor with
psammoma bodies. Clinicopathologic features in two cases. Arch
Pathol Lab Med. 1988;112:798-800.
2) Fetsch JF, Montgomery EA, Meis JM. Calcifying fibrous
pseudotumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:502-8.
3) Montgomery E: Calcifying fibrous tumor. Fletcher CDM, Unni
KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification
of Tumours, pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and
bone. Lyon:IARC Press; 2002. 77-8.
4) Bell DM, Dekmezian RH, Husain SA, Luna MA. Oral calcifying
fibrous pseudotumor: Case analysis and review. Head Neck
Pathol. 2008;2:343-7.
5) Azam M, Husen YA, Pervez S. Calcifying fibrous pseudotumor in
association with hyaline vascular type Castleman's disease. Indian
J Pathol Microbiol. 2009;52:527-9.
6) Zamecnik M, Dorociak F, Vesely L. Calcifying fibrous
pseudotumor after trauma. Pathol Int. 1997;47:812
7) Pomplun S, Goldstraw P, Davies SE, Burke MM, Nicholson AG.
Calcifying fibrous pseudotumour arising within an inflammatory
pseudotumour: Evidence of progression from one lesion to the
other? Histopathology. 2000;37:380-2.
8) Hill KA, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Chou PM. Calcifying fibrous
pseudotumor versus inflammator my ofibroblastic tumor: A
histological and immunohistochemical comparison. Mod Pathol.
2001;14:784-90.
9) N ascimento AF, Ruiz R, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Calcifying
fibrous ‘pseudotumor': Clinicopathologic study of 15 cases and
analysis of its relationship to inflammatory myofibroblastic
tumor. Int J Surg Pathol. 2002;10:189-96.
10) Weynand B, Draguet AP, Bernard P, Marbaix E, Galant C.
Calcifying fibrous pseudotumour: First case report in the
peritoneum with immunostaining for CD34. Histopathology.
1999;34:86-7.
11) Maeda T, Hirose T, Furuya K, Kameoka K. Calcifying fibrous
pseudotumor: An ultrastructural study. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1999;
23:189-92.
12) Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. 5th ed. Weiss SW,
Goldblum JR, editors. Mosby Elsevier; 2008. 294-7.
13) Hoffmann H, Beaver ME, Maillard AAJ. Calcifying fibrous
pseudotumor of the neck. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:435-7.