Herein we are reporting a very rare case of concomitant choroidal hemangioma with trans-scleral invasion in an eye that harbored active recurrent intraocular RB in a 1-yearold child that was misinterpreted by MRI as extraocular extension of RB. MEDLINE search of the published literature did not show any similar cases.
Examination under anesthesia showed normal anterior segment, and intraocular pressure was 14mmHg in both eyes. Dilated fundus exam of the right eye revealed large macular retinal amelanotic mass associated with focal subretinal seeds and vitreous seeds within 3mm of the tumor (Figure 1A). There were no abnormal iris vessels or anterior segment invasion. The left fundus exam was unremarkable.
Orbit MRI revealed a right endophytic, dome-shape intraocular mass that showed a hyper intense signal on T1- weighted images and intermediate signal on T2-weighted images with mild homogeneous post contrast enhancement (0.6cmx1.3cm) and no extra scleral extension or optic nerve invasion.
The initial clinical diagnosis was unilateral intraocular endophytic retinoblastoma (RB); international intraocular retinoblastoma (IIRC) group C[5]. The family elected to follow conservative therapy (rather than enucleation), and therefore the patient received 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (CVE) combined with focal consolidation therapy. Since the tumor was active and localized after 6 cycles, I-125 radioactive plaque was inserted. Initially the tumor showed regression, but tumor recurrence was seen 4 months after plaque surgery, associated with massive recurrent retinal seeds (Figure 1B).
Initial plan for this recurrence was intra-arterial chemotherapy versus enucleation, but new MRI showed extra-scleral invasion at the base of the previously treated tumor (Figure 2A,B). Therefore enucleation was performed. At the time of enucleation, gross inspection of the globe did not show extra-scleral tumor extension or optic nerve invasion. The bisected eye harbored a grossly amelanotic tumor measuring 11x4mm. Microscopic examination revealed a differentiated RB with endophytic growth pattern associated with minimal choroid invasion and no optic nerve invasion or extra scleral extension. The RB cells did not extend into or beyond the sclera, however, there was another amelanotic growth underneath the RB composed of proliferation of thin-walled large caliber vessels (dilated spaces, filled with blood) that had the longest diameter parallel to the surface of the choroid and penetrated the sclera. The growth showed positive staining for CD34 and FLI-1 stains that made it consistent with hemangioma (Figure 3A-D).
Interestingly, this lesion was at the site of the base of the tumor corresponding to the suspicious area of trans-scleral extension seen on MRI, and this had been misinterpreted on MRI as a RB with extraocular extension. There was no histological evidence of extraocular or trans-scleral RB, and the only explanation for the discrepancy between the MRI findings and the pathology findings was the detected unexpected hemangioma at this site.
The final histopathologic diagnosis was differentiated intraocular RB associated with choroidal hemangioma. Orbit MRI was repeated 3 months after the surgery, and there was no tumor recurrence.
Based upon the findings of a study of 1543 patients with a diagnosis of intraocular and/or orbital space occupying lesions, the differential diagnosis of a lesion involving both the orbit and the eye includes RB, idiopathic inflammatory pseudotumor, lymphoma, and Sturge-Weber syndrome[8].
The most common concomitant scenario is RB with orbital extension, even in a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome. In a single case in this series, the patient had RB with intraocular and extraocular extension, and although he had Sturge-Weber syndrome, there was no concomitant hemangioma. In our patient, we were looking pathologically for evidence of extraocular tumor extension at the site that was seen in MRI. No extraocular extension by RB was noted in the initial pathologic review of the sections, and therefore we could not find an explanation for the MRI finding of scleral invasive RB. However; upon further pathology review, a hemangioma was noted corresponding exactly to the site and morphology of the scleral invasion reported in MRI. Immuno-histochemical staining confirmed the diagnosis and therefore no further management was necessary. Full body examination of the patient failed to show any evidence of hemangiomas, so this patient did not have Sturge-Weber syndrome.
Choroidal hemangiomas are congenital vascular hamartomas that have been reported in 2 varieties: solitary circumscribed hemangiomas, and diffuse hemangiomas. Riss et al.[9] reported a case of a 4-year-old boy with a diffuse choroidal hemangioma, and without features of the Sturge-Weber syndrome, which presented as a grayish intraocular mass with an overlying retinal detachment associated with orbital mass. The pathologic examination revealed choroidal hemangioma involving the entire choroid with an extra-scleral extension. Similarly, Frau et al.[10] reported a case of atypical circumscribed choroidal hemangioma with retinal detachment in a 41-year-old man in which ultrasonography showed a hyper-echogenic area extending through the sclera, and surgical exploration revealed an extra-scleral hemangioma. Our patient would have the circumscribed type of choroidal hemangioma with trans-scleral extension.
In conclusion we are reporting a very rare case of pathologically diagnosed concomitant choroidal hemangioma with trans-scleral extension in an eye that harbored active recurrent intraocular RB in a 1-year-old child. This trans-scleral extension of hemangioma was misdiagnosed radiologically as extraocular RB and resulted in enucleation. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of this unusual association.
CONFLICT of INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1) International Incidence of Childhood Cancer, Vol. II. IARC Sci
Publ. 1998:1-391.
2) Yousef YA, Al-Hussaini M, Mehyar M, Sultan I, Jaradat I,
AlRawashdeh K, Khurma S, Deebajah R, Nawaiseh I. The
Predictive Value of TNM Classification, The International
Classification, and Reese- Ellsworth staging of retinoblastoma
for the likelihood of high risk pathologic features. Retina.
2015;35:1883-9.
3) Kivela T. The epidemiological challenge of the most frequent
eye cancer: Retinoblastoma, an issue of birth and death. British
Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009;93:1129-31.
4) Razek AA, Elkhamary S. MRI of retinoblastoma. Br J Radiol.
2011;84:775-84.
5) Linn Murphree A. Intraocular retinoblastoma: The case for a new
group classification. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18:41-53.
6) Kaliki S, Shields CL, Rojanaporn D, Al-Dahmash S, McLaughlin
JP, Shields JA, Eagle RC Jr. High-risk retinoblastoma based on
international classification of retinoblastoma: Analysis of 519
enucleated eyes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:997-1003.
7) Kopelman JE, McLean IW, Rosenberg SH. Multivariate analysis
of risk factors for metastasis in retinoblastoma treated by
enucleation. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:371-7.
8) Yan L, Shen T, Chen J. Concomitant Intraocular and Orbital
Space-Occupied. Optom Open Access 2016; 1:2.