Figure 2: CT abdomen showing a cystic lesion in lower pole of the right kidney.
Figure 3: Removal of the cyst by upper transverse extraperitoneal approach.
Grossing of specimen was done using personal protective equipment to prevent exposure. Sectioning of the cysts was done under formalin immersion to avoid aerosolization.
The aspirated fluid was sent for cytological and microbiological analysis. Representative sections were taken from different areas of the cyst wall. Microscopic examination of the wet mount preparation of the cyst fluid showed a few scolices with refractile hooklets (Figure 4).
Figure 4: wet mount preparation of cyst fluid showing few scolices with refractive hooklets.
MGG staining revealed numerous protoscolices (Figure 5), and a histological examination of the cyst wall showed an acellular lamellated layer with protoscolices on H&E staining (Figure 6).
Diagnosis of renal hydatid cysts is aided by radiological studies such as ultrasonography, followed by CT and MRI. According to the Gharbi et al classification system, hydatid cyst disease can be classified into 5 classes. Type I is well defined anechoic cyst with thickened wall, type II displays detachment of the germinative membranes, type III includes multicystic multi septated lesions, type IV shows heterogenous degenerated cyst with internal echoes, and type IV involves calcification [4]. A CT scan provides more accurate results than ultrasonography [5]. Since ELISA and serological testing are positive in only 50% of cases, they can offer limited assistance. The indirect hemagglutination test is more effective in detecting renal hydatid cysts [6]. However, the sensitivity of these tests drops to around 25-56% in extrahepatic disease, limiting the usefulness of serology as a diagnostic tool [7].
Hydatid cyst should always be considered as a differential diagnosis for renal cysts, particularly in endemic areas. Surgical excision with pericystectomy or partial/total nephrectomy is the treatment of choice, depending on the extent of renal parenchymal damage. In our case, the renal parenchyma was not involved and so only enucleation of the cyst contents was performed, using hypertonic saline and betadine as scolicidal agents, and oral albendazole was prescribed for one month.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Authorship Contributions
Concept: NK, SKR, Design: NPAB, VV, Data collection and/or
processing: SKR, HKB, VSM, Analysis and/or interpretation: NK,
NPAB, Literature search: VV, VSM, Writing: NK, NPAB, Approval:
SKR, HKB.
1) Blanton R. Echinococosis. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St. Geme
JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE (eds); Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics
19th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. 2011;1237-9.
2) Amrani A, Zerhouni H, Benabdallah FF, Belkacem R, Outarahout
O. Renal hydatid cyst in children: report of six cases. Ann Urol. 2003;37:8-12.
3) Kern P, Menezes da Silva A, Akhan O, Müllhaupt B, Vizcaychipi
KA, Budke C, Vuitton DA. The echinococcoses: Diagnosis,
clinical management and burden of disease. Adv Parasitol.
2017;96:259369.
4) Turgut A, Ödev K, Kabaalioglu A, Bhatt S, Dogra V. Multitechnique
evaluation of renal hydatid disease. Am J Roentgenol.
2009;192(2):462-7.
5) Sarah JM, Christopher WJ, Warren DJ. Parasitic diseases of
the genitourinary system. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick
AC,Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology.
9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007;458-9.