Material and Methods: A prospective case-control study was conducted, including fifty pre-eclampsia cases, twenty-five eclampsia cases, and twenty-five normal pregnancy controls. Detailed clinicopathological data, histomorphological features of the placenta, and fetal outcomes were collected. PD-L1 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry, with a semi-quantitative scoring system. The relationship between PD-L1 expression, histopathological scores, and fetal outcomes was also evaluated.
Results: In this study, a lower expression of PD-L1 was observed in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia as compared to a normal pregnancy. Adverse fetal outcomes were associated with lower PD-L1 expression and with reduced placental weight and high histopathological scores (>5).
Conclusion: Lower PD-L1 expression was observed in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia compared to normal pregnancies. Reduced PD-L1 expression correlated with histomorphological changes in the placenta and adverse fetal outcomes.
The programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand, PD-L1, form an important molecular pathway involved in immune regulation during pregnancy. This PD-1/PDL1 axis helps maintain maternal tolerance to the fetus by promoting the development of regulatory T (Treg) cells and inhibiting effector T cell responses. Dysfunction in this pathway, particularly reduced expression of PD-L1, may contribute to the pathogenesis of PE and eclampsia (EC) by allowing overactivation of T cells[4,5].
While the role of PD-L1 in maintaining normal pregnancy has been established, few studies have specifically evaluated its expression in PE and EC. This study aims to correlate the expression of PD-L1 in the placentae of patients with PE and EC and to investigate its association with histomorphological features and fetal outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria
PE: Female patients aged ≥18 years with a blood pressure
of more than or equal to 140/80 mmHg and proteinuria
(more than or equal to 0.3 g/24 hours) after 20 weeks of
pregnancy.
EC: Patients diagnosed with PE complicated by seizures.
Control: Healthy pregnant women aged ≥18 with normal, full-term deliveries.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with co-morbidities such as chronic hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, hepatitis B and C, or HIV were excluded.
The study included 100 placental tissues: 50 from PE patients,
25 from EC patients, and 25 from controls. Detailed
clinicopathological data were collected after obtaining informed
consent from participants.
Histopathological Analysis
Placental tissue was grossly and microscopically examined
according to standard protocols[6]. The weight and thickness
of the placenta were recorded, and areas of infarction
(Figure 1A) and calcification (Figure 1B) were noted. Microscopic
lesions were scored using a semi-quantitative
scoring system[7]:
Fibrin Deposition (Figure 1C):
Score 0: Absent
Score 1: Intravillous/Perivillous
Score 2: Intravillous and Perivillous
Maternal Floor Infarction (Figure 1D):
Score 0: Absent (less than 5% infarcted area)
Score 1: Single area (more than 5% infarcted in a single
area)
Score 2: Multiple area (more than 5% infarcted in more
than one area)
Calcification (Figure 1E):
Score 0: Absent
Score 1: Focal
Score 2: Diffuse
Syncytial Knots:
Score 0: Absent
Score 1: Present
Villous Basement Membrane Thickening (Figure 1F):
Score 0: Absent (< 3% thickening)
Score 1: Thickened (> 3% thickening)
Score 2: Hyalinized
Immunohistochemistry and Semi-Quantitative Scoring
of PD-L1 Expression
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to evaluate
PD-L1 expression in placental tissue. The tissue blocks
from placental biopsies were selected for analysis, focusing
on the villi and decidua basalis. Monoclonal Rabbit Anti-PD-L1 (clone RBT-PDL1, Bio SB, USA) was the primary
antibody, diluted in PBS with 1% BSA and 0.09% sodium
azide.
Antigen retrieval was performed using a microwave technique with citrate buffer (pH 6.0), followed by hydrogen peroxide treatment to block endogenous peroxidase. After incubating with the primary antibody for 1 hour, the secondary antibody was applied for 45 minutes. Tonsil tissue was used as a positive control, while negative controls omitted the primary antibody. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted.
PD-L1 expression was assessed by examining the membranous staining on the outer surface of syncytiotrophoblasts[8]. Ten random villi were selected from the fetomaternal interface at 4x magnification and the extent of staining were analyzed as shown in Table I. The scoring system was as follows:
Table I: Semi-quantitative scoring for PD-L1 expression[7].
Score 0 (Figure 2A): 0-10% (circumference of villistained)
Score 1 (Figure 2B): 10-50% (circumference of villistained)
Score 2 (Figure 2C): 50-90 %(circumference of villistained)
Score 3 (Figure 2D): >90%(circumference of villi-stained)
An average score from ten villi was calculated, and scores 0-1 were considered low expression, while scores 2-3 were considered high expression.
PD-L1 expression was correlated in patients with PE, EC, and controls. Additionally, PD-L1 expression showed correlations with histopathological features and fetal outcomes, as detailed in Table II.
Table II: Association of PD-L1 score with Clinicopathological parameters.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) to compare PD-L1 expression scores
between PE, EC, and control groups. The correlation between
PD-L1 expression, histopathological features, and
fetal outcomes were also assessed. A p-value of less than
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Table III: Clinicopathological Characteristics of case and control.
In this study, the age distribution between the three groups—Normal Pregnancy (NP), Pre-Eclampsia (PE), and Eclampsia (EC)—did not show any significant differences. The majority of participants in all three groups were in the 21-25 years age range, with NP and PE cases being predominantly in this age group, followed by EC.
The gestational age at the time of delivery was significantly different between the groups. In the NP group, most pregnancies were carried to 35-40 weeks gestation, whereas PE and EC cases had a higher proportion of pregnancies at 25-35 weeks gestation, indicating a trend towards preterm delivery in these conditions.
There was no significant difference in parity between the groups, with both primigravida and multigravida patients distributed relatively evenly across the three groups.
Regarding placental characteristics, there was a significant difference in placental weight across the groups. `In the PE and EC groups, the majority of the placentas weighed less than 400 grams, and in contrast, only 36% of placentas in the NP group weighed less than 400 grams.
Similarly, placental thickness was significantly lower in both PE and EC groups than NP.
Immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 expression as seen in Table IV revealed a significant difference between the groups. In the PE and EC groups, low PD-L1 expression (scores 0 and 1) was seen in the majority of cases (80% and 88%, respectively), whereas the NP group showed predominantly high PD-L1 expression (scores 2 and 3) in 84% of cases. The difference in PD-L1 expression between the groups was statistically significant (p-value 0.001), with normal pregnancies showing higher expression than the diseased groups.
The correlation between PD-L1 expression and various clinical and histopathological parameters was also assessed as seen in Table IV. Placental weight showed a significant association with PD-L1 expression. Cases with low placental weight (less than 400 grams) had predominantly low PD-L1 expression (scores 0 and 1), while those with normal placental weight (less than 400 grams) showed higher PDL1 expression (scores 2 and 3) (p-value <0.05).
Table IV: Correlation of PD-L1 expression in cases of Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia.
Although adverse fetal outcomes (low birth weight and stillbirth) were more common in cases with low PD-L1 expression, this association was not statistically significant (p-value 0.827).
However, a trend was observed where higher PD-L1 expression was linked to better fetal outcomes, with 19% of cases with scores 2 and 12% with a score of 3 showing normal fetal outcomes, compared to lower fetal survival rates in cases with scores 0 and 1.
In terms of histopathological severity, a higher histopathological score (greater than 5) was associated with low PDL1 expression (33% in score 0, 20% in score 1), while higher PD-L1 expression was observed in cases with a lower histopathological score (6% in score 2, 13% in score 3) (p = 0.01). This suggests that low PD-L1 expression may be associated with more severe placental pathology.
The study identified that the majority of affected women were aged 21-25 years, followed by the 26-30 years` age group. This observation aligns with evidence suggesting that vascular aging and increased arterial stiffness contribute to endothelial dysfunction, a characteristic feature of PE[9-12]. Additionally, primiparity emerged as a significant risk factor for PE, likely due to the first-time exposure to fetal antigens from the chorionic villi, which challenges maternal immunological adaptation[13,14].
Gestational age was significantly impacted, with preterm delivery (less than 37 weeks) frequently observed in PE and EC cases. This finding corroborates earlier studies suggesting that preeclampsia leads to preterm delivery rather than being caused by it[15,16]. Adverse fetal outcomes, such as fetal growth restriction (FGR), low birth weight (LBW), and stillbirths, were more prevalent in the case group. LBW was observed in 44% of PE and 48% of EC cases, similar to 40% in normotensive pregnancies. However, the incidence of stillbirths was three times higher in PE and EC cases than controls, underscoring the profound impact of placental insufficiency and maternal systemic inflammatory responses[17,18].
Placental pathology revealed significant gross and histopathological changes in PE and EC.
Placentas in the case group often weighed less than 400 g (56% in PE and 64% in EC) and exhibited reduced thickness (less than 2.0 cm)[19]. Histomorphological findings included abnormal vasculature, parenchymal infarction, intervillous and perivillous fibrin deposition, syncytial knotting, and villous basement membrane thickening. These findings reflect severe placental malperfusion, correlating with the severity of maternal hypertension[20].
The PD-L1 pathway emerged as a crucial mediator in terminating immune responses and inducing immune tolerance. PD-L1 promotes regulatory T cell (Treg) development while inhibiting effector T cell responses, specifically Th17 immunity, contributing to exaggerated systemic inflammation[21-23].
Apart from autoimmune disorders, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway also establishes maternal-fetal tolerance by promoting the Treg/Th17 balance. It has been reported that pregnant mice treated with anti-PD-L1 blocking anti-body lose their embryos. A deficiency in PD-L1 has been associated with an increased frequency of fetal resorption and decreased fetal survival[24]. However, the precise role of the PD-1/ PD-L1 pathway in PE is unclear, thus this study was undertaken to understand the role of PD-1/PD-L1 in the pathogenesis of PE.
Immunohistochemistry analysis of PD-L1 expression in PE and EC cases revealed a predominant staining pattern on the membranous side of the chorionic villi. Also, a semi-quantitative scoring system of PD-L1 was used, and PDL1 expression was evaluated by analyzing the percentage of the circumference of the villi stained, which was scored from 0-3[8]. Comparison of PD-L1 expression in the case groups (PE and EC) to the control group (NP) as done using statistical analysis as shown in Table IV.
Correlation analyses unveiled associations between lower PD-L1 expression and adverse fetal outcomes, as well as specific histopathological parameters as seen in Table II. The study suggested a potential correlation between gross and histopathological features of PE and PD-L1 expression, indicating a disrupted balance between immunotolerance and immunoactivation. Moreover, murine model findings supported the crucial role of PD-1/PD-L1 in normal pregnancy and fetal outcomes. Variable PD-L1 expression has been seen in patients with PE. Some authors have found reduced expression, whereas others have found increased expression of PD-L1 in cases of PE[24,25]. Further investigation is warranted to delineate the role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in pre-eclampsia (PE). Limitations of our study include a smaller sample size and reliance on immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1 expression evaluation. Other sensitive techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and flow cytometry could enhance precision.
Our study uniquely correlated histopathological parameters with PD-L1 expression. A significant association was found between lower PD-L1 expression and histopathological features, including low placental weight, fibrin deposition, maternal floor infarction, and villous basement membrane thickening (Table III). This novel approach highlights a potential link between gross and histopathological manifestations in PE. The disrupted balance between immunotolerance and immune activation signifies immune regulation failure, exacerbating inflammatory responses and PE[26]. Additionally, these factors may contribute to placental malperfusion, manifesting as histomorphological changes observed in our study. PD-L1 expression was further correlated with adverse fetal outcomes, revealing that low PD-L1 expression is associated with adverse outcomes due to abnormal maternal inflammatory responses. Although limited human studies were found, murine models demonstrated a higher rate of fetal growth restriction and fetal resorption in pre-eclamptic rats. Treating these rats with PD-L1-Fc corrected these developmental aberrations, reinforcing the crucial role of PD-1/PD-L1 in normal pregnancy and fetal outcomes.
In conclusion, our study highlights the pivotal role of PD-L1 in pre-eclampsia pathogenesis and adverse fetal outcomes[27,28]. Larger studies are warranted to explore PD-L1 pathway activators like PD-L1-Fc as potential therapeutic targets in PE treatment[27,29,30]. This study emphasizes the significance of standardized reporting using a uniform scoring system for placental pathologies associated with uteroplacental insufficiency, such as pre-eclampsia.
This study emphasizes the importance of PD-L1 in the pathogenesis of PE and its association with adverse fetal and placental outcomes. The findings suggest that restoring PD-L1 function could be a potential therapeutic strategy. Larger studies incorporating advanced techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and flow cytometry are needed to validate these findings and refine our understanding of PD-L1`s role. Additionally, standardization of placental pathology reporting using uniform scoring systems would enhance clinical relevance and facilitate the exploration of PD-L1 activators, such as PD-L1-Fc, as therapeutic options in the management of PE. The study underscores the disrupted balance between immunotolerance and immune activation in PE, providing insights into its pathophysiology and potential interventions.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Authorship Contributions
Concept: KV, ST, Design: VM, ST, KV, Data collection and/or
processing: ST, Analysis and/or interpretation: ST, KV, Literature
search: ST, Writing: ST, Approval: VM, KV.
1) Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia:
Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circ Res.
2019;124(7):1094-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313276.
2) Mor G, Cardenas I. The immune system in pregnancy: A
unique complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63:425-33. doi:
10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00836.x
3) Mittelberger J, Seefried M, Franitza M, Garrido F, Ditsch N,
Jeschke U, Dannecker C. The Role of the Immune Checkpoint
Molecules PD-1/PD-L1 and TIM-3/Gal-9 in the Pathogenesis
of Preeclampsia-A Narrative Review. Medicina (Kaunas).
2022;58(2):157. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020157. PMID:
35208481; PMCID: PMC8880413.
4) Miko E, Meggyes M, Doba K, Barakonyi A, Szereday L. Immune
Checkpoint Molecules in Reproductive Immunology. Front Immunol.
2019;10:846. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00846.
5) Chikuma S. Basics of PD-1 in self-tolerance, infection, and cancer
immunity. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:448-55. doi: 10.1007/
s10147-016-0958-0.
6) Kaplan C. Gross examination of the placenta. Surg Pathol Clin.
2013;6:1-26.
7) Donthi D, Malik P, Mohamed A, Kousar A, Subramanian RA,
Manikyam UK. An Objective Histopathological Scoring System
for Placental Pathology in Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia. Cureus.
2020;12(10):e11104.
8) van 't Hof LJ, Dijkstra KL, van der Keur C, Eikmans M, Baelde
HJ, Bos M, van der Hoorn MLP. Decreased expression of ligands
of placental immune checkpoint inhibitors in uncomplicated and
preeclamptic oocyte donation pregnancies. J Reprod Immunol.
2020;142:103194.
9) Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Koga
K, Francisco RPV, Whitehead C, Hyett J, da Silva Costa F, Nicolaides
K, Menkhorst E. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Primers.
2023;9(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6.
10) Liu B, Nadeem U, Frick A, Alakaloko M, Bhide A, Thilaganathan
B. Reducing health inequality in Black, Asian and other minority
ethnic pregnant women: impact of first trimester combined
screening for placental dysfunction on perinatal mortality. BJOG.
2022;129(10):1750-1756. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17109. Epub
2022 Feb 27. PMID: 35104381; PMCID: PMC9544950.
11) Akhlaq M, Nagi AH, Yousaf AW. Placental morphology in preeclampsia
and eclampsia and the likely role of NK cells. Indian
J Pathol Microbiol. 2012;55(1):17-21. doi: 10.4103/0377-
4929.94848. PMID: 22499294.
12) Robillard PY, Dekker G, Scioscia M, Bonsante F, Iacobelli S,
Boukerrou M, Hulsey TC. The blurring boundaries between
placental and maternal preeclampsia: a critical appraisal of 1800
consecutive preeclamptic cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
2022;35(13):2450-2456. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1786516.
Epub 2020 Jul 6. PMID: 32627713.
13) Das S, Das R, Bajracharya R, Baral G, Jabegu B, Odland JØ, Odland
ML. Incidence and Risk Factors of Pre-Eclampsia in the Paropakar
Maternity and Women's Hospital, Nepal: A Retrospective
Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3571.
14) Collier AY, Smith LA, Karumanchi SA. Review of the immune
mechanisms of preeclampsia and the potential of immune modulating
therapy. Hum Immunol. 2021;82(5):362-70.
15) Udainia A, Jain ML. Morphological Study of Placenta in Pregnancy
Induced Hypertension with its Clinical Relevance. J Anat
Soc India 2001;50(1): 24-7.
16) Heestermans T, Payne B, Kayode GA, Amoakoh-Coleman M,
Schuit E, Rijken MJ, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Bloemenkamp K,
Grobbee DE, Browne JL. Prognostic models for adverse pregnancy
outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a
systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e001759.
17) Nasri F, Zare M, Hesampour F, Ahmadi M, Ali-Hassanzadeh M,
Mostafaei S, Gharesi-Fard B. Are genetic variations in IL-1β and
IL-6 cytokines associated with the risk of pre-eclampsia? Evidence
from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal
Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6600-9.
18) Alves Junior JM, Bernardo WM, Ward LS, Villagelin D. Effect
of Hyperthyroidism Control During Pregnancy on Maternal and
Fetal Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front
Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:800257.
19) Narang K, Szymanski LM. Multiple Gestations and Hypertensive
Disorders of Pregnancy: What Do We Know? Curr Hypertens
Rep. 2020;23(1):1.
20) Chhatwal J, Chaudhary DN, Chauhan N. Placental changes in
hypertensive pregnancy: a comparison with normotensive pregnancy.
Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018;7:3808-13.
21) Lu B, Teng X, Fu G, Bao L, Tang J, Shi H, Lu W, Lu Y. Analysis
of PD-L1 expression in trophoblastic tissues and tumors. Hum
Pathol. 2019;84:202-212.
22) Meggyes M, Miko E, Szigeti B, Farkas N, Szereday L. The importance
of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the maternal-fetal interface.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12884-
019-2218-6.
23) Tian M, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sun G, Mor G, Liao A. The PD-1/PD-L1
inhibitory pathway is altered in pre-eclampsia and regulates T
cell responses in pre-eclamptic rats. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27683.
24) Zhang YH, Tian M, Tang MX, Liu ZZ, Liao AH. Recent Insight
into the Role of the PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Feto-Maternal Tolerance
and Pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2015;74(3):201-8.
doi: 10.1111/aji.12365.
25) Zhu X, Lang J. Soluble PD-1 and PD-L1: predictive and prognostic
significance in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(57):97671-82. doi:
10.18632/oncotarget.18311.
26) Okazaki T, Chikuma S, Iwai Y, Fagarasan S, Honjo T. A rheostat
for immune responses: the unique properties of PD-1
and their advantages for clinical application. Nat Immunol.
2013;14(12):1212-8.
27) Hu X, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Wang L, Li Z, Mor G, Liao A. Newly characterized
decidual Tim-3+ Treg cells are abundant during early
pregnancy and driven by IL-27 coordinately with Gal-9 from
trophoblasts. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(11):2454-66. doi: 10.1093/
humrep/deaa223.
28) Habicht A, Dada S, Jurewicz M, Fife BT, Yagita H, Azuma M,
Sayegh MH, Guleria I. A link between PDL1 and T regulatory
cells in fetomaternal tolerance. J Immunol. 2007;179(8):5211-9.