For diagnostic purposes, a Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) procedure was performed. During VATS, chylous fluid and cystic structures were observed in the mediastinal region. Thin-walled subpleural cystic structures were identified in the lower lobes of the lungs (Figure 1E-F). Samples were taken from the lower lobes of the lungs and the mediastinum for diagnostic evaluation.
Pathological Examination and Diagnosis
Macroscopic examination revealed subpleural cystic structures
in the parenchymal sample, with a maximum diameter
of 5 cm, taken from the lower lobe of the right lung.
The parenchymal cut surface appeared spongy with a pinkred
coloration. In the mediastinum, fibrolipomatous tissue
with a maximum diameter of 2 cm was observed.
Microscopic examination of serial sections showed preserved lung architecture. Notably, in the subpleural areas, cystic structures surrounded by flattened cells were observed, forming anastomosing networks. These structures were embedded in stroma containing oval or elongated fibroblast-like cells with nuclei of similar morphology. The described lesions were identified within the interalveolar septa (Figures 2A-D). The lesions extended to the subepithelial areas in the peribronchiolar region. The interstitial anastomosing cystic lesions mimicked emphysematous changes. No significant findings were observed in the lung parenchyma surrounding the lesions.
In the mediastinal tissue, isolated or grouped dilated spaces resembling fibrolipomatous structures were observed around major arteries and veins. These spaces were lined by endothelial-like cells but showed no significant accumulation within them. The nature and distribution of these lesions, as well as the involvement of both the lung parenchyma and mediastinum, strongly suggested a diagnosis of diffuse pulmonary lymphangiomatosis.
Immunohistochemical Study
In the described anastomosing structures, positive immunoreactivity
for D2-40 (Figures 3A,B), CD31 (Figures
3C,D), and CD34 (Figure 3E) confirmed the endothelial
origin of the cells. In perivascular cells, positive immunoreactivity
for SMA (Figure 3F) and progesterone receptor
(Figures 4B,C) was observed. Focal positivity was also
noted with the estrogen receptor in these same cells. No
immunoreactivity was detected with HMB45 in either endothelial
cells or perivascular stromal cells.
While no immunoreactivity was observed in the lesions with the TTF-1 antibody, immunopositivity was present in the surrounding parenchymal alveolar epithelium (Figure 4A). These findings confirmed the diagnosis of diffuse pulmonary lymphangiomatosis.
In most cases, the disease can affect multiple organs. The most commonly affected organs include the bones, liver, and spleen[2]. When multiple organs are involved, lesions can also be detected in the lung parenchyma. Symptoms of the disease include progressive or long-standing shortness of breath and wheezing, which may mimic asthma. Hemoptysis can also occur[3]. In advanced stages of the disease, chyloptysis may be seen due to stagnation of lymphatic flow. Rare complications include chylous ascites, chylopericardium, and protein-losing enteropathy[4]. The complaints and findings in our case are consistent with those described in the literature.
Thoracic CT findings include thickening of the interlobular septa and bronchovascular regions, irregular groundglass opacities, widespread infiltration in the mediastinum and hilum, and pleural effusion[5,6]. In our case, similar findings were observed, although significant pleural effusion was not detected. Differential diagnoses based on radiology include pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis and lymphangiectasia.
Diffuse pulmonary lymphangiomatosis is typically a progressive disease with a poor prognosis. Patients often experience recurrent chylous accumulations and mediastinal compression. Respiratory failure, caused by chylous fluid accumulation in the lungs and pleura or by infection, can result in death[7].
Pathological evaluation of lymphangiomatosis reveals proliferation characterized by anastomosing lymphatic vessels lined with endothelium and cystic spaces. In immunohistochemical studies, endothelial cells in lymphangiomatosis are positive for D2-40, CD31, and Factor VIII-related antigens. Additionally, the spindle cells in the stromal tissue between the anastomosing vascular structures are positive for SMA but negative for HMB-45. In contrast, spindle cells in lymphangioleiomyomatosis are positive for both SMA and HMB-45[8].
The histopathological findings in our case are consistent with diffuse pulmonary lymphangiomatosis. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis, a condition included in the differential diagnosis, was excluded based on the absence of cystic structures lined with endothelium and the lack of HMB-45 antibody reactivity. While lymphangiomatosis can occur in both men and women, lymphangioleiomyomatosis is significantly more common in women[9].
Although the chest CT findings of lymphangiomatosis and pulmonary lymphangiectasia are often similar, histopathologically, lymphangiomatosis is characterized by an increased number of lymphatic vessels of varying sizes. In contrast, microscopic examination of pulmonary lymphangiectasia cases reveals dilated but non-proliferating lymphatic channels[9,10].
In our case, the lymphatic anastomosing channels, particularly in the subpleural areas, may be confused with emphysema. TTF-1, which demonstrates positive immunoreactivity in the adjacent parenchyma but negative in lymphangiomatous areas, is an important biomarker. For less experienced pathologists, emphysema should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Most treatments for this disease are palliative[2]. However, thoracic surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and experimental treatments such as doxycycline sclerotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, interferon α-2b, and propranolol have been explored[11].
When compared to the literature, the immunohistochemical reactions and clinical findings observed in this case have strengthened the diagnosis. The rarity of such cases, combined with the diversity of clinical presentations, makes diagnosing this disease particularly challenging.
Conflict of Interest
No conflicts of interest are declared.
Authorship Contributions
Concept: HNU, EC, Design: HNU, EC, Data collection and/or
processing: HNU, EC, Analysis and/or interpretation: HNU, EC,
Writing: HNU, EC, SGB, Approval: HNU, EC, SGB.
1) Zhang J, Jin H, Wang Y, Bai C, Han Y. A case of diffuse pulmonary
lymphangiomatosis with unilateral lung invasion. Oxf Med Case
Reports. 2015;2015(10):346-8. PMID: 26512334. DOI: 10.1093/
omcr/omv059.
2) Faul JL, Berry GJ, Colby TV, Ruoss SJ, Walter MB, Rosen GD,
Raffin TA. Thoracic lymphangiomas, lymphangiectasis, lymphangiomatosis,
and lymphatic dysplasia syndrome. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med. 2000;161(3 Pt 1):1037-46. PMID: 10712360. DOI:
10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9904056
3) Sun X, Shen W, Xia S, Wen T, Wang R. Diffuse Pulmonary Lymphangiomatosis:
MDCT Findings After Direct Lymphangiography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(2):300-5. PMID: 27845836.
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16589
4) El Hajj L, Mazières J, Rouquette I, Mittaine M, Bolduc JP, Didier
A, Dahan M, Joffre F, Chabbert VC. Diagnostic value of bronchoscopy,
CT and transbronchial biopsies in diffuse pulmonary
lymphangiomatosis: case report and review of the literature.
Clin Radiol. 2005;60(8):921-5. PMID: 16039928. DOI: 10.1016/j.
crad.2005.03.006
5) Zhang S, Zhong D, Zhao L, Liu M, Gao Q, Wan J, Zhai Z. Diffuse
pulmonary lymphangiomatosis involving lungs and mediastinal
soft tissue. Am J Med Sci. 2022;364(1):118-23. PMID: 35405139.
DOI: 0.1016/j.amjms.2022.03.015.
6) Luisi F, Torre O, Harari S. Thoracic involvement in generalised
lymphatic anomaly (or lymphangiomatosis). Eur
Respir Rev. 2016;25(140):170-7. PMID: 27246594. DOI:
10.1183/16000617.0018-2016
7) Biscotto I, Rodrigues RS, Forny DN, Barreto MM, Marchiori
E. Diffuse pulmonary lymphangiomatosis. J Bras Pneumol.
2019;45(5):e20180412. PMID: 31531617. DOI: 10.1590/1806-
3713/e20180412
8) Putta T, Irodi A, Thangakunam B, Oliver A, Gunasingam R.
Young patient with generalized lymphangiomatosis: Differentiating
the differential. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2016;26(3):411-5.
PMID: 27857472. DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.190416
9) Taveira-DaSilva AM, Pacheco-Rodriguez G, Moss J. The natural
history of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: markers of severity, rate
of progression and prognosis. Lymphat Res Biol. 2010;8(1):9-19.
PMID: 20235883. DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2009.0024