Turkish Journal of Pathology

Türk Patoloji Dergisi

Turkish Journal of Pathology

Turkish Journal of Pathology

2014, Vol 30, Num, 2     (Pages: 105-110)

Interobserver Agreement Among Histological Patterns and Diagnosis in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Halide Nur ÜRER 1, Rengin AHISKALI 2, Naciye ARDA 1, Sebnem BATUR 3, Leyla CİNEL 4, Gerhard DEKAN 5, Neslihan FENER 1, Pınar FIRAT 6, Silvana GELEFF 5, Büge ÖZ 3, Yasemin ÖZLÜK 6, Kürşat YILDIZ 7, Emine Dilek YILMAZBAYHAN 6, Handan ZEREN 8, Atilla UYSAL 9

1 Departments of Pathology, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Education and Research Hospital, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
2 Department of Pathology, Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
3 Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medicine Faculty, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
4 Ministry of Health Istanbul Medeniyet University, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
5 Medical University of Vienna, VIENNA, AUSTRIA
6 Istanbul University, Istanbul Medicine Faculty, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
7 Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
8 Acibadem University, Faculty of Medicine, ISTANBUL, TURKEY
9 Departments of Chest Diseases, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Education and Research Hospital, ISTANBUL, TURKEY

DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2014.01231
Viewed: 3592
Downloaded : 2082

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the interobserver agreement in determination of the dominant histological pattern and the final diagnosis in lung adenocarcinomas.

Material and Method: A total of 12 patients with a diagnosis of primary lung adenocarcinoma were included in the study. Twelve pathologists from eight study centers were asked first to determine the dominant histological pattern in these cases and then to decide whether the final diagnosis was in situ, minimally invasive or invasive adenocarcinoma.

Results: The kappa value for the agreement in determining the dominant pattern among the pathologists was 0.36 (p<0.001), with the values for the lepidic, acinar, papillary, solid, micropapillary patterns and mucinous character of adenocarcinoma being 0.34, 0.28, 0.30, 0.80, 0.16 and 0.38 respectively (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001). None of the cases was diagnosed as in situ adenocarcinoma. On the other hand, the kappa value for the agreement in differentiating minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma among reviewers was 0.17 (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The agreement among pathologists in determining the subtype of lung adenocarcinomas that depends on the identification of the dominant pattern was at intermediate level. In addition, the agreement in deciding whether the case is minimally invasive or invasive, was at low level. The criteria defining the histological patterns should be clarified and described in more detail. Educational activities and larger multicenter studies might be helpful in improving the agreement and standardization.

Keywords : Adenocarcinoma, Lung neoplasms, Interobserver variations