Here we describe a case of renal PNET in a 10-year-old girl who presented at our institute with haematuria and abdominal lump. Computer tomography scan revealed a huge mass in the right kidney. Computer tomography-guided aspiration from the mass showed cytomorphological features of a small blue round cell tumor. The patient underwent right radical nephrectomy. Histopathology with supplementary immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of PNET. She has been receiving treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy post-surgery and is currently disease free.
Primary renal PNET is a distinct and rare entity. This tumor is very aggressive with low survival rate, even with a multi-disciplinary approach. We reported the case because it is rare in children, poses diagnostic challenges, is aggressive in behaviour and responds poorly to treatment.
Grossly, the specimen measured 14.5x10x8 cm and weighed 700 gm. The cut surface showed that almost the entire renal parenchyma was replaced by a solid, grey white tumor with areas of haemorrhage, necrosis, and cystic degenerations (Figure 1B). Multiple sections examined from the tumor showed tumor cells arranged in diffuse solid sheets, vaguely separated by broad fibrous bands, interspersed with perivascular pseudo-rosettes and haemorrhage at places (Figure 2A-C). The individual tumor cells were small and round with scanty vacuolated cytoplasm, and had round to oval vesicular to hyperchromatic nuclei, evenly dispersed granular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli and frequent mitosis. Large areas of necrosis and occasional lymphovascular emboli were also seen (Figure 2D). The renal sinus and perinephric fat showed involvement by the tumor, though the resected end of the ureter and hilar vessels and sampled lymph nodes were free of pathology. Periodic acidSchiff (PAS) stain for intracytoplasmic glycogen revealed an occasional cell with minimal glycogen (Figure 2E). A provisional diagnosis of small blue round cell tumor, possibly ES/PNET was made. A panel of IHC was ordered for chromogranin (CG), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), CD 99, Wilms' tumour (WT1), leukocyte common antigen (LCA), cytokeratin (CK), myogenin, desmin. The cells showed a strong and diffuse predominantly membranous expression of CD 99 (Figure 2F) with focal positivity for NSE; however the cells were immuno-negative for WT1, CG. Other makers which were negative included LCA (leukocyte common antigen), CK (cytokeratin), myogenin, desmin. Based on morphology and IHC results, a final diagnosis of renal PNET/ES was given. Molecular testing for the EWS-FLI-1 fusion gene or IHC for FLI1 expression could not be performed due to non-availability.
The patient had an uneventful post-operative period and was subsequently referred to the department of Oncology-Radiotherapy for further management. She was started on chemotherapy four weeks post-surgery and has completed two cycles of chemotherapy without any obvious metastasis or recurrence.
Renal PNET commonly affects young adults, though the age range is 4 - 61 years in reported cases. It more commonly affects males, with a male to female ratio of 3:1[8]. Most cases of renal PNET are diagnosed on resected specimens, based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnosis includes other small round cell tumors, including Wilms' tumour, neuroblastoma, and lymphoma. These tumors are composed of primitiveappearing round cells with a high nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. Perivascular pseudo-rosettes are usually identified; Homer- Wright rosettes are less frequently seen. A commonly appreciated feature on electron microscopy is aggregates of cytoplasmic glycogen granules though sometimes polar processes, microtubules or neurosecretory granules are seen, suggesting a neuronal differentiation[9]. Tumor cells express CD99 (MIC2) and FLI-1 with variable positivity for neuroendocrine markers including NSE, synaptophysin, and CG. WT1, a marker for Wilms' tumor, is not expressed in PNET. A combination of markers is generally helpful in arriving at the correct diagnosis. Eighty to ninety five percent of the cases show t(11;22) (q24;q12) while the remaining ones often display an EWS/Ets-related gene (ERG) mutation[10]. Cytogenetic studies could not be performed in our case because of non-availability.
Radiological findings of renal PNET are nonspecific and commonly show a massive renal mass. Imaging finding of the present case included a large contrast-enhancing hyper- and hypo-dense mass without contrast excretion through the pelvi-calyceal system with very thin residual renal parenchyma.
As in other sites, renal PNET is very aggressive and about 50% patients come with distant metastasis at presentation. Common sites for metastasis are regional lymph nodes, liver, and lung. Overall survival is low and most patients do not live beyond one year following the diagnosis. Patients are generally treated with a multi-modality approach; radical nephrectomy with combination of chemotherapy with drugs including vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and ifosfamide[9]. Adjuvant radiation is given in patients with incomplete resection, positive resection margins, or recurrence.
In conclusion, primary renal PNET is a distinct and rare entity, typically affecting young adults. This tumor is very aggressive with a low survival rate, even with multimodality treatment. Although the incidence of renal PNET in children is low, oncologists and pathologists need to be aware of this tumor and every attempt should be made to differentiate it from other more common tumors as it carries very poor prognosis. Morphology alone can only suggest PNET as an important differential of small round cell tumors; ancillary techniques and immunohistochemistry for CD99 with or without a molecular test are vital to establish a correct diagnosis. We reported this case for its aggressive nature and rarity in children.
1) Maeda M, Tsuda A, Yamanishi S, Uchikoba Y, Fukunaga Y, Okita
H, Hata J. Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of
the kidney in a child. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50:180-3.
2) A ghili M, Rafiei E, Mojahed M, Zare M. Renal primitive
neuroectodermal tumor: Does age at diagnosis impact outcomes?
Rare Tumors. 2012;4:e15.
3) Giridhar P, Mallick S, Kumaran D, George A, Kaushal S, Julka
PK. Primitive neuro-ectodermal tumour of kidney in adult:
Report of four consecutive cases and review of the literature. J
Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2015;27:235-8.
4) Jimenez RE, Folpe AL, Lapham RL, Ro JY, O'Shea PA,
Weiss SW, Amin MB. Primary Ewing's sarcoma/primitive
neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: A clinicopathologic and
immunohistochemical analysis of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol.
2002;26:320-7.
5) Funahashi Y, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, Mizutani K, Yoshino Y,
Matsukawa Y, Sassa N, Okumura K, Gotoh M. Ewing's sarcoma/
primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney. Aktuelle Urol.
2009;40:247-9.
6) Sout AP. A tumour of the ulnar nerve. Proc N Y Pathol Sco.
1918;18:2-12.
7) Seemayer TA, Thelmo WL, Bolande RP, Wiglesworth FW.
Peripheral neuroectodermal tumors. Perspect Pediatr Pathol.
1975;2:15172.
8) Mandal PK, Mukherjee S, Roy S, Bhattacharyya NK. PNET of
kidney: Report of four cases. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol.
2012;33:130-3.