Materials and Methods: We reviewed 56 fine needle aspiration cytology specimens which were reported as “suspicious for follicular-patterned lesions of thyroid” between years 2001 and 2005 in our hospital and their histological slides. Parameters for cytopathologic assesment are cellularity, colloid formation, multilayered rosette formation, follicular cell rings, monolayered sheets, intact follicles, hyperplastic papillae, hyaline stromal fragments, intranuclear inclusions, nuclear grooves, angulated nuclei, nucleoli, cerebriform nuclei, nuclear size, macrophages, flame cells and Hurthle cells. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 and Fisher's-exact tests and Kolmogorov-Simirnov test.
Results: Four cytopathologic features–cerebriform nuclei, angulated nuclei, nuclear grooves and intranuclear inclusion- were constantly observed in the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (p< 0.05). Diluted colloid, monolayered sheet, nuclear size, macrophage and nucleoli were frequently seen in nodular hyperplasia (p< 0.05). The nuclear size was the sole differential cytopathologic criteria between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Detailed cytopathologic examination was found to be important in differentiating follicular variant of papillary carcinoma from nodular hyperplasia. On the other hand, none of the cytopathologic findings were sufficient to distinguish follicular adenoma from follicular carcinoma. Therefore, cytopathologists should report such lesions as “follicular neoplasms”.
Thyroid fine needle aspirations were performed by (cyto)pathologists and radiologists using 22-27 gauge needles attached to 10 ml plastic syringes. (Cyto)pathologists used Cameco syringe holders (Cameco, Sweden) in order to fix the syringe, and prepared both airdried and wet-fixed (95% ethanol) smears Radiologists smeared the aspirated materials directly on clean glass slides and let them airdry. The air-dried smears were stained with May –Grünwald Giemsa (MGG) and the alcoholfixed smears with Papanicolaou (PAP) and Hematoxylene-Eosin (HE) solutions.
The parameters for cytological assessment included cellularity, the presence of colloid, multilayered rosettes (a form of ring lined by stratified follicular cells), follicular cell rings (small follicular groups of follicular cells from 6 to 12 are arranged as a ring with or without a small amount of central colloid ), monolayered sheets, intact follicles (consisted of spheres of colloid surrounded by nuclei imparting a threedimensional appearance), hyperplastic papillae (Hp) (papillary cellular structures containing intact- nonintact follicles), hyaline stromal fragments, intranuclear inclusions (INI), nuclear groove (NG), angulated nuclei, nucleoli, cerebriform nuclei, nuclear size, macrophages, flame cells and Hurthle cells (Figure 1,2,3,4).
Figure 1: Hyaline stromal fragment attached to epithelial cells (May Grünwald Giemsa x100).
Figure 2: Hyperplastic papilla (May Grünwald Giemsa x100).
Figure 3: Intact follicle (May Grünwald Giemsa x100/1.25,oil).
Figure 4: Cerebriform nucleus (May Grünwald Giemsa x100/1.25, oil).
The presence of these cytomorphological
features was scored ranging from 0 to 2.
[(for colloid: 0, none; 1, watery; 2, globularropy)
(for the nuclear size-comparison to a red
blood cell- 1,
The statistical methods used included χ2
analysis and Fisher's exact test and Kolmogorov-
Simirnov Test (α=0.05).
The cytological findings, which were
found to be statistically significant, in defining
nodular hyperplasia, are absence of angulated
(n=28, 68.3%) and cerebriform (n=29, 58%)
nuclei, small nuclear size (nuclear size
Table 2: Results of Fisher's Exact Test for follicular-patterned
thyroid lesions.
Table 3: Results of Kolmogorov-Simirnov Test for NH and
FVPC.
Table 4: Histopathological diagnosis and nodule size.
Cerebriform nuclei (n=6, 100%) and
angulated nuclei (n=9, 60%) (p<0.05) were the
most important diagnostic cytological features
for FVPC cases as well as the presence of INI
(n=4, 66.7%) and nuclear grooves (n=6, 37.5%)
(p<0.05) (Table 2 and 4). Cellularity, nuclear
size, the presence of follicular cell rings, colloid,
flame cells, Hurthle cells, hyperplastic papillae,
hyaline stromal fragments, intact follicules,
macrophages, monolayered sheets, multilayered
rosettes and nucleoli were not found to be diagnostic
for FVPC (p>0.05).
In FA cases, the only significant cytological
feature was the nuclear size (>x2 of a red
blood cell, n=9, 37.5%) (p<0.05) (Table 2). The
presence of follicular cell ring, colloid, flame
cells, Hurthle cells, hyperplastic papillae, hyaline
stromal fragments, INI, intact follicules,
macrophages, monolayered sheets, multilayered
rosettes, nuclear grooves or nucleoli was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
In case of FC, we could not define any
statistically significant cytological diagnostic
criteria for, but nodule size, which is a clinical
parameter, was found more significant than the
other lesions.
Deshpande et al. have used the term follicular neoplasm in FNAC of the thyroid for hyperplastic nodules, follicular adenomas and follicular carcinomas due to difficulty in differentiating these three lesions by FNAC[16].
The accuracy rate of a definitely malignant diagnosis with thyroid FNAC has been shown to range between 90 and 100%; however, only the up to 20% of the cases diagnosed as “follicular neoplasms” were reported as malignant on the examination of the surgical excision materials[12,14]. The goal of thyroid FNAC is to identify the nodules that require surgery and to decrease the number of unnecessary thyroidectomies for patients with benign disease[15,17].
Among 4080 FNAC samples, 225 (5.51%) of them were diagnosed as “suspicious cytology for follicular patterned lesions”. Fifty six of two hundred and twenty five cases (24.88%) underwent surgical excision. Histopathological diagnoses of these 56 cases were malignant in 14 (25%) and benign in 42 (75%) cases. Among the benign lesions, 29 (1.8%) were nodular hyperplasia, and 13 (23.2%) were follicular adenomas. These findings were similar to those of Baloch et al. where 9 nodules (69%) were benign, and 4 nodules (31%) were malignant[18]. Greaves et al. reported an excision rate of 41%, with 67 benign lesions (70%) and 29 malignancies (30%)[6].
Baloch et al. reported that nodules of 3 cm or greater were commonly associated with malignancy[12]. In our study, the size of the FC nodules was greater than all other follicularpatterned lesions, but the size of the nodules in FAs was greater than the nodules of FVPC (FC>FA>FVPC>NH).
We found that that the most significant
distinguishing features of nodular hyperplasia
different from other follicular-patterned lesions
were diluted colloid (73,3%), monolayered sheets
(76.0%), smaller nuclear size (
Hag et al. reported that NH was histologically
characterized by the presence of hyperplastic
papillae. Hyperplastic papillae were easily
recognised in cell blocks and less readily in
smears[1]. But Kung et al. reported their presence
in only 8% of the smears from the cases
of NH[19]. In our materials, hyperplastic papillae
were detected in 66,7% of smears of NH, but
this was not statistically significant (p>0,05).
The occurrence rate of Hp in FVPC was found
out to be 25%. This value was similar to that
found by Hag et al. They reported the incidences
of hyperplastic papillae and colloid in FVPC as
25% and 75%, respectively[1]. But Hp should
not be accepted as a definitive sign of benignity.
Overlapping nature of these features made the
differentiation of FVPC from NH rather difficult.
Other features frequently encountered in
NH were follicular cell rings, flame cells,
Hurthle cells, hyaline stromal fragments, intact
follicules and less frequently INI, NG and angulated
nuclei (Table 1).
The FVPC is the most common cause
for false-negative FNA results. The presence of
abundant colloid, monolayer sheets, and paucity
of nuclear features of papillary carcinoma caused
diagnostic difficulties[11].
Cytological findings such as colloid,
multilayered rosettes, follicular cell rings, monolayered
sheets, hyperplastic papillae, hyaline
stromal fragments, nuclear groove- even present
focally- are important clues to identify FVPC[11]. The diagnosis of FVPC is solely dependent
on the nuclear features (oval, enlarged, overlapped nuclei with optically clear or ground-glass
appearance and frequent grooves and pseudoinclusions)[20]. The characteristics of optically
clear nuclei of papillary carcinoma may be caused
by the alteration of chromatin associated
with RET/PTC oncogene, enhanced by formalin
fixation artefact and are not seen in cytological
specimens, except when processed with Ultrafast
Pap stain[20,21].
In our study, the presence of cerebriform
nuclei, angulated nuclei, nuclear grooves,
intranuclear inclusions was statistically highly
significant (p<0,05) in differentiation of papillary
carcinoma folliculary variant from follicular
neoplasm. Additionally, we found out that
the presence of cerebriform cells in FVPC (100
%) is very important, as they have been described
a little in this neoplasm previously in the
literature[22,23].
Wu et al. reported that the cytological
diagnosis of FVPC could be difficult because of
the paucity of nuclear changes of papillary carcinoma
and overlapping features of both benign
and malignant follicular lesions[20]. In some
cases, cytological interpretation of FVPC may
also be difficult owing to the paucity of nuclear
features of papillary carcinoma, and can be mistaken
as hyperplastic nodules. Baloch et al.
diagnosed such lesions as suggestive of papillary
carcinoma and recommended intraoperative
frozen section and touch preparation for definitive
diagnosis[5].
In FNA of FVPC, the most consistent
low-power architectural finding is the presence
of flat syncytial sheets. Flat syncytial sheets in
FVPC often branch with nuclear crowding and
are different from flat sheets of colloid nodule,
which usually form a honeycomb pattern[20].
In our study, monolayered sheets were present
in12% of FVPC.
In our study, the only significant cytological
feature was the nuclear size (>x2 of a red
blood cell) for FA. Other cytological criteria
were not statistically significant. El Hag et al.
reported that FA showed none of the aforementioned features. They were always moderately
cellular, usually devoid of colloid and demonstrated
rings and round to ovoid crowded clusters
of follicular cells[1]. Similar results were also
reported by Das et al.[12].
The assessment of detailed cytological
findings of follicular-patterned thyroid lesions
was helpful in differential diagnosis between
follicular variant of papillary carcinoma and
nodular hyperplasia. We think that the presence
of cerebriform nucleus in FVPC is very important.
Differentiation among various follicularpatterned
lesions of thyroid will decrease the
number of unnecessary surgeries. Additionally,
cytological findings are not sufficient enough to
distinguish follicular adenoma from follicular
carcinoma. Therefore, (cyto)pathologists should
continue to indicate these lesions as “follicular
neoplasms” in fine-needle aspiration cytology
reports of the thyroid.
1) El Hag A, Kollur SM. Benign follicular thyroid lesions
versus follicular variant of papillary carcinoma: differentiation
by architectural pattern. Cytopathology
2004;15:200-205.
2) Goldstein RE, Netterville JL, Burkey B, Johnson JE.
Implications of follicular neoplasms, atypia and lesions
suspicious for malignancy diagnosed by fine-needle
aspiration of thyroid nodules. Ann Surg 2002;225:656-
664.
3) Ersöz C, Fırat P, Uguz A, Mocan Kuzey G. Fine-needle
aspiration cytology of solitary thyroid nodules. Cancer
(Cancer Cytopathol) 2004;102:302-307.
4) Zacks JF, Morenas AdI, Beazley RM, O'brien MJ.
Fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of colloid
nodule versus follicular variant of papillary carcinoma
of the thyroid. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:87-90.
5) Yang GCH, Liebeskind D, Messina AV. Should cytopathologists
stop reporting follicular neoplasms on
fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid? Cancer (Cancer
Cytopathol) 2003;99:69-74.
6) Baloch ZW, Livolsy VA. Follicular patterned lesions of
the thyroid. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;117:143-150.
7) Greaves TS, Olvera M, Florentine BD, Raza AS, Cobb
CJ, Tsao-Wei DD et al.. Follicular lesions of thyroid.
Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2000;90:335-341.
8) Logani S, Gupta P, LiVolsi VA, Mandel S, Baloch ZW.
Thyroid nodules with FNA cytology suspicious for
follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma:
follow-up and management. Diagn Cytopathol
2000;23:380-385.
9) Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA. Our approach to follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid. J Clin Pathol
2007;60:244-250.
10) Lerma E, Mora J, Thyroid Study Group. Telomerase
activity in “suspicious” thyroid cytology. Cancer
(Cancer Cytopathol) 2005;105:492-7.
11) Priollet BC, Thienpont FL. Aspiration cytology in
diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Cytopathology 2005;16:65-67
12) Welker MJ, Orlov D. Thyroid nodules. Am Fam
Physician 2003;67:559-66,573-574.
13) Baloch Z, Latfield LJ. Quest for a uniform cytodiagnostic
approach to thyroid aspirates: a consensus
proposal. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;34:85-86.
14) Deveci MS, Deveci G, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Fineneedle
aspiration of follicular lesions of the thyroid:
diagnosis and follow-up. Cytojournal 2006;3:9.
15) Raber W, Kaserer K, Niederle B, Vierhapper H. Risk
factors for malignancy of thyroid nodules initially
identified as follicular neoplasia by fine-needle aspiration:
results of a prospective study of one hundred
twenty patients. Thyroid 2000;10:709-712.
16) Wu HHJ, Jones JN, Osman J. Fine-needle aspiration
cytology of the thyroid: ten years experience in a community
teaching hospital. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;34:93-100
17) Baloch ZW, Fleisher S, Livolsy VA, Gupta PK.
Diagnosis of “follicular neoplasm”: a grey zone in
thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology. Diagn
Cytopathol 2002;26:41-44.
18) Das DK, Khanna CM, Tripathi RP, Pant CS, Mandal
AK, Chandra S, et al. Solitary nodular goitre: review of
cytomorphologic features in 441 cases. Acta Cytol
1999; 43:563-574.
19) Berner A, Sigstad, Pradhan M, Grøholt KK, Davidson
B. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid gland:
comparative analysis of experience at three hospital.
Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:97-100.
20) Deshpande V, Kapila K, Sai KS, Verma K. Follicular
neoplasms of the thyroid: decision tree approach using
morphologic and morphometric parameters. Acta Cytol
1997;41:369-376.
21) Sanchez N, Selvaggi SM. Utility of cell blocks in the
diagnosis of thyroid aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol
2005;34:89-92.
22) Baloch ZW, Sack MJ, Yu GH, Livolsi VA, Gupta PK.
Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid: an institutional experience.
Thyroid 1998;8:565-569.
23) Kung ITM, Yuen RWS. Fine needle aspiration of
thyroid distinction between colloid nodules and follicular
neoplasms using cell blocks and 21 - gauge needle.
Acta Cytol 1989;33:53-60.
24) Gallagher J, Oertel YC, Oertel JE. Follicular variant of
papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: fine-needle aspirates
with histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol
1997;16:207-213.
25) Powari M, Dey P, Saikia UN. Fine needle aspiration
cytology of follicular variant of papillary carcinoma of
thyroid. Cytopathology 2003;14:212-215.
26) Wu HHJ, Jones JN, Grzybicki DM, Elsheikh TM.
Sensitive cytologic criteria for the identification of
follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma in
fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol
2003;29:262-266.
27) Delellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C. Papillary
Carcinoma. In: LiVolsi VA, Albores-Saavedra J, Asa
SL et al. editors. Pathology & Genetics Tumours of
Endocrine Organs, World Health Organization . IARC
Press, 2004, p:57-66.
28) Yang GC, Greenebaum E. Clear nuclei of papillary
thyroid carcinoma conspicuous in fine-needle aspiration
and intraoperative smears processed by Ultrafast
papanicalou stain. Mod Pathol 1997;10:552-555.